Miscellaneous Supreme Court dispositions, June 11, 2010

416
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT
DISPOSITIONS
(233 P3d 818)
BALLOT TITLES CERTU'IED
June 11, 2010
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S058432). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 79 (2010) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S058433). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 5 (2012) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.
Tauman v. Kroger (S058370). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 4 (2012) does not comply sub-
stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to
the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the pro-
posed ballot measure.