Petitions for review, February 25-March 12, 2014

837
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
(325 P3d 738)
ALLOWED
February 28, 2014
State v. Avila-Nava, Celso (A146527)(S061802)(257 Or App 364)
Original orders issued February 28, withdrawn;
amended orders issued March 12, 2014
State v. Canfield, Cody Gean (A143570)(S061046)(251 Or App 442, 283 P3d 438,
adh’d to as modified on recons, 253 Or App 574 (2012)). Petitioner’s petition for
review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this
case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State
v. Backstrand, 354 Or 392, 313 P3d 1084 (2013), State v. Highley, 354 Or 459,
313 P3d 1068 (2013); and State v. Anderson, 354 Or 440, 313 P3d 1113 (2013).
State v. Dierks, Stacy Lynn (A149290)(S061580)(257 Or App 88). Petitioner’s pe-
tition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated,
and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light
of State v. Backstrand, 354 Or 392, 313 P3d 1084 (2013), State v. Highley, 354
Or 459, 313 P3d 1068 (2013); and State v. Anderson, 354 Or 440, 313 P3d
1113 (2013).
State v. Magana, Manuel Alejandro / Rivera, Jose Guadalupe Ramirez (A145917)
(A145963)(S061599)(257 Or App 251). Petitioner’s petition for review is al-
lowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is re-
manded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Back-
strand, 354 Or 392, 313 P3d 1084 (2013), State v. Highley, 354 Or 459, 313
P3d 1068 (2013); and State v. Anderson, 354 Or 440, 313 P3d 1113 (2013).
State v. Thompson, Debra Francis (A145643)(S061053)(254 Or App 282). Petitioner’s
petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated,
and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light
of State v. Backstrand, 354 Or 392, 313 P3d 1084 (2013), State v. Highley, 354
Or 459, 313 P3d 1068 (2013); and State v. Anderson, 354 Or 440, 313 P3d
1113 (2013).
State v. Zamora-Martinez, Juan Jose (A129382)(S059748)(244 Or App 213). Peti-
tioner’s petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals
is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsider-
ation in light of State v. Backstrand, 354 Or 392, 313 P3d 1084 (2013), State
v. Highley, 354 Or 459, 313 P3d 1068 (2013); and State v. Anderson, 354 Or
440, 313 P3d 1113 (2013).
DENIED
February 28, 2014
Cascade Physical Therapy v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (A148032-34)
(A148036/37)(A148039)(S061886)(258 Or App 612)
Department of Human Services v. C. J. (A154282)(S061985)(259 Or App 716)
Department of Human Services v. C. R. W. (A154231)(S061991)(259 Or App 716)
Department of Human Services v. K. M. M. (A153861)(S061967)(260 Or App 34)
Department of Human Services v. P. D. T. (A154515/16)(S061939)(259 Or App
716)
Fogleman, Anthony Robert v. Nooth (A148647)(S061935)(259 Or App 306)
James, Allen Lamont v. Franke (A152781)(S061893)(259 Or App 546)

838 	PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued
(325 P3d 739)
State ex rel Dewberry v. Kitzhaber (A146366)(S061963)(259 Or App 389)
State v. Alamillo, Connor Enrique (A140994)(S059512)(241 Or App 351)
State v. Alarcon, Angela Maria (A144927)(S061921)(259 Or App 462)
State v. Bahmatov, Pavel V. (A151696)(S061956)(260 Or App 563)
State v. Chirrick, Randall Scott (A143698)(S061937)(259 Or App 306)
State v. Dudley, Melodee Lynette (A137482)(S059991)(245 Or App 301)
State v. Gaona-Reyna, Edgar (A150715)(S061970)(260 Or App 190)
State v. Jones, Michael Roy (A140767)(S060033)(245 Or App 186)
State v. Knudsen, Erik Charles (A150566)(S061955)(259 Or App 306)
State v. Krahmer, Nicholas Alan (A150216)(S061953)(260 Or App 190)
State v. Orellano, Selvin (A149989)(S061947)(259 Or App 306)
State v. Ross, Gayla (A143451)(S061949)(259 Or App 546)
DISMISSED
February 25, 2014
River City Investment Co. v. Nolting (A151724)(S062049)(258 Or App 204, 308 P3d
1079). On February 13, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for review with the Or-
egon Supreme Court. The petition for review is procedurally improper and un-
timely. The petition for review is dismissed on the court’s own motion.