Miscellaneous Supreme Court dispositions, March 19, 2012

676
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT
DISPOSITIONS
BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED
(276 P3d 1124)
March 19, 2012
Carson/Thorpe v. Kroger (S059719)(S059724)(351 Or 508). The court certifies to
the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s modified ballot title for Proposed
Initiative Petition No. 22 (2012).
Girod v. Kroger (S059713)(351 Or 389). Petitioner Steven Ernest Fick’s motion to
strike, and alternative request for permission to further respond, is denied.
The objections to the Attorney General’s modified ballot title, filed by
petitioner Cary Johnson, petitioner Steven Ernest Fick, and amicus curiae
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, are not well taken, and the
court denies the same. The request by petitioners Fred Girod, Rod Monroe,
and David Schamp for an award of costs against petitioner Steven Ernest Fick
is denied. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s
modified ballot title for Proposed Initiative Petition No. 21 (2012). ORS
250.085(10)(a).
Girod v. Kroger (S059996)(351 Or 563). The motion to appear as amicus curiae,
filed by Steven Ernest Fick, is granted. The court determines that the objec-
tions to the modified ballot title, filed by amicus Fick, are not well taken, and
the court denies the same. The motion for issuance of the appellate judgment,
filed by petitioners Fred Girod, Rod Monroe, and David Schamp, is denied. The
court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s modified ballot
title for Proposed Initiative Petition No. 26 (2012). ORS 250.085(10)(a).
Green v. Kroger (S060099). Petitioner’s argument that the Attorney General’s cer-
tified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 40 (2012) does not comply substan-
tially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the
Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed
ballot measure.
Harmon v. Kroger (S060080). Petitioners’ arguments that the Attorney General’s
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 33 (2012) do not comply substan-
tially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) are not well taken. The court certifies to the
Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed
ballot measure.
Harmon v. Kroger (S060081). Petitioners’ arguments that the Attorney General’s
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 34 (2012) do not comply substan-
tially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) are not well taken. The court certifies to the
Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed
ballot measure.
Harmon v. Kroger (S060082). Petitioner’s argument that the Attorney General’s
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 39 (2012) does not comply sub-
stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to
the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the pro-
posed ballot measure.
Harmon v. Kroger (S060096). Petitioner’s argument that the Attorney General’s
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 35 (2012) does not comply sub-
stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to
the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the pro-
posed ballot measure.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW—Continued 	677
(276 P3d 1125)
March 22, 2012
Harmon v. Kroger (S060095). Petitioner’s argument that the Attorney General’s
certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 30 (2012) does not substantially
comply with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the
Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed
ballot measure.
CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS,
MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS
March 22, 2012
Allen v. Marquis Companies I, Inc. (S060051). Alternative writ of mandamus
issued.