In The Matter of The Care and Treatment of Darrell Jackson

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Matter
of The Care and Treatment of Darrell Jackson, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

Judge Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-262

Submitted April 1, 2010 – Filed April 29,
2010   

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.
J. Shupe, and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., all of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Darrell Jackson appeals his commitment to the South Carolina
Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and
the following authorities: State v.
Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541
S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001) (holding a motion in limine to exclude evidence
made at the beginning of trial does not generally preserve the issue for
appellate review because a motion in limine is not a final determination); State
v. Floyd, 295 S.C. 518, 520, 369 S.E.2d 842, 843 (1988) ("A
ruling on the motion is not the ultimate disposition on the admissibility of
evidence.  It remains subject to change based upon developments during trial.").

AFFIRMED.  

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.