CourtListener 10854115•In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael Terrance Lawyer
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael Terrance Lawyer
CourtListener 10854115Scctapp6 mai 2026
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael
Terrance Lawyer, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2024-001439
Appeal From Clarendon County
R. Kirk Griffin, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-211
Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
Kindle Kay Johnson, of K. Johnson Law Firm, LLC, of
Charleston, and Michael Terrance Lawyer, pro se, both
for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Christopher Runyan,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.