In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael Terrance Lawyer

CourtListener 10854115Scctapp6 mai 2026

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael
Terrance Lawyer, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2024-001439

Appeal From Clarendon County
R. Kirk Griffin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-211
Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Kindle Kay Johnson, of K. Johnson Law Firm, LLC, of
Charleston, and Michael Terrance Lawyer, pro se, both
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Christopher Runyan,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.