Shannon Aldrich v. Daren Masters, Jr., CDMM Enterprises d/b/a Texas School of Phlebotomy, 820 Yeager Lane, Ltd. d/b/a Alta Mesa Court — Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Shannon Aldrich v. Daren Masters, Jr., CDMM Enterprises d/b/a Texas School of Phlebotomy, 820 Yeager Lane, Ltd. d/b/a Alta Mesa Court — Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Txctapp2
Texte intégral
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-26-00322-CV ___________________________ On Appeal from the 236th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 236-345963-23 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion S HANNON ALDRICH, Appellant V. D AREN M ASTERS , J R ., CDMM ENTERPRISES D/ B/ A T EXAS S CHOOL OF P HLEBOTOMY , 820 YEAGER LANE , LTD. D/ B/ A ALTA M ESA C OURT, Appellees
2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was due on September 8, 2026. On September 11, 2026, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. Per Curiam Delivered: October 15, 2026
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.