CourtListener 10659637•Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club
Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club
CourtListener 10659637Txctapp119 août 2025
Texte intégral
Opinion issued August 19, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-24-00771-CV
———————————
AHMAD FATEMIZADEH, Appellant
V.
SUGAR CREEK COUNTRY CLUB, Appellee
On Appeal from the 268th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 23-DCV-311210
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Ahmad Fatemizadeh has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal
because the parties have reached a settlement. In his certificate of conference,
appellant’s counsel stated that he attempted to reach opposing counsel concerning
the motion to dismiss, but he was unable to reach him. Therefore, the Court held
this motion for 10 days to permit the filing of any opposition or response. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No response was received.
We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),
43.2(f). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.