CourtListener 10845395•In Re Anjeneya Vijay Cheruvu v. the State of Texas
In Re Anjeneya Vijay Cheruvu v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10845395Txctapp114 avr. 2026
Texte intégral
Opinion issued April 14, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-26-00320-CV
———————————
IN RE ANJENEYA VIJAY CHERUVU, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Anjeneya Vijay Cheruvu, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ
of mandamus challenging the trial court’s March 19, 2026 “Order Holding [Relator]
in Contempt (Possession or Access).”1 In his petition for writ of mandamus, relator
argued that the trial court’s contempt order was void because “the trial court lacked
1
The underlying case is In the Interest of XXX, a Child, Cause No. 14-DCV-217759,
in the 505th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Kali L.
Morgan presiding.
jurisdiction to render” the order. Relator therefore requested that this Court grant
mandamus relief and direct the trial court to vacate its March 19, 2026 contempt
order.
We conclude that relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus
relief, and therefore, the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We
dismiss any pending motion as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Guiney.
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.