CourtListener 10801231•Aundraye Marcellas Curry v. the State of Texas
Aundraye Marcellas Curry v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10801231Txctapp1026 févr. 2026
Texte intégral
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00145-CR
Aundraye Marcellas Curry,
Appellant
v.
The State of Texas,
Appellee
On appeal from the
County Court at Law of Navarro County, Texas
Judge Amanda Doan Putman, presiding
Trial Court Cause No. C42128-CR
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Aundraye Marcellas Curry was convicted of stalking, enhanced, and
sentenced to 40 years in prison. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Curry’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief
in support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate
record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Counsel's
brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and compliance
with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel has
performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders, 386 U.S. at
744; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Kelly
v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252
S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all
the proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders, 386
U.S. at 744; see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d
300 (1988); accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any
basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10, 108
S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this
appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v.
State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm
the trial court's judgment.
Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Curry is granted.
LEE HARRIS
Justice
Curry v. State Page 2
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: February 26, 2026
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Affirmed; Motion granted
Do Not Publish
CRPM
Curry v. State Page 3
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.