Jason Arnold v. Cheryl Lieck Henry in Her Official Capacity as District Attorney of the 344th Judicial District

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 29, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00440-CV

JASON ARNOLD, Appellant

V.
CHERYL LIECK HENRY IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF THE 344TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court
Chambers County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 24DCV0075

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed March 14, 2024.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed June 11, 2024. Appellant’s notice of appeal
was not filed timely. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. A motion to extend time is
necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal
beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within
the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time.
See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the
predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the
15-day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.

On July 23, 2024, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was
subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.

2