CourtListener 10797504•Kennecia Williams v. SPCP Reese Owner, LLC
Kennecia Williams v. SPCP Reese Owner, LLC
CourtListener 10797504Txctapp219 févr. 2026
Texte intégral
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-25-00372-CV
___________________________
KENNECIA WILLIAMS, Appellant
V.
SPCP REESE OWNER, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025-004231-1
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on December 5, 2025. On December 23, 2025, we
notified Appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See
Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless, on or before January 2, 2026, Appellant filed with the court an
Appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s
untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We received no response.
On January 20, 2026, we sent another notice to Appellant informing her that
her brief had still not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless,
on or before January 30, 2026, Appellant filed with the court an Appellant’s brief and
an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an
extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Once again, we
received no response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: February 19, 2026
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.