CourtListener 10863906•In Re Salman Ali v. the State of Texas
Texte intégral
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-26-00285-CV
___________________________
IN RE SALMAN ALI, Relator
Original Proceeding
481st District Court of Denton County, Texas
Trial Court No. 23-4984-481
Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wallach, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and is of
the opinion that relief should be denied. The trial court heard conflicting evidence
regarding relator’s purported inability to pay; relator failed to persuade the trial court.
See Ex parte Dabau, 732 S.W.2d 773, 777 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1987, orig.
proceeding). The trial court is the factfinder, and it is its responsibility to weigh the
evidence and judge the witnesses’ credibility. Ex Parte Roosth, No. B14-93-01037-CV,
1994 WL 2012, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 6, 1994, orig. proceeding)
(not designated for publication). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas
corpus is denied.
Having denied relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, we vacate the
portion of our May 7, 2026 order providing for his discharge on the execution and
filing of a bond in the amount of $100,000.
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 20, 2026
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.