CourtListener 10025367•St. John Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. of Dallas, Texas v. Michael Rollerson and Gloria Smith Rollerson, Individually and A/N/F M.R., a Minor Child
St. John Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. of Dallas, Texas v. Michael Rollerson and Gloria Smith Rollerson, Individually and A/N/F M.R., a Minor Child
CourtListener 10025367Txctapp524 juil. 2024
Texte intégral
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 24, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00518-CV
ST. JOHN MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. OF DALLAS, TEXAS,
Appellant
V.
MICHAEL ROLLERSON AND GLORIA SMITH ROLLERSON,
INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F M.R., A MINOR CHILD, Appellees
On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-03833
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen, III
Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
St. John Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. of Dallas, Texas brings this
interlocutory appeal from the denial of its plea to the jurisdiction. We questioned
our jurisdiction because it does not appear appellant is a governmental unit.
Appellant responded, conceding it is not a governmental unit, but suggesting we
should exercise jurisdiction because it concerns the doctrine of ecclesiastical
abstention. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellate review is ordinarily limited to final judgments. Harley
Channelview Prop., LLC v. Harley Marine Gulf, LLC, 690 S.W.3d 32, 37 (Tex.
2024). This Court has jurisdiction to consider appeals of interlocutory orders only
if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction. See id.; Stary v. DeBord, 967
S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998). The legislature determines, by statute, whether a
particular type of pretrial ruling is appealable before a final judgment is rendered.
Dallas County v. Alejo, 243 S.W.3d 21, 25 (Tex. App—Dallas 2007, no pet.). We
strictly construe such statutes because they are an exception to the general rule. See
Dallas County v. Wadley, 168 S.W.3d 373, 375 (Tex. App—Dallas 2005, pet.
denied).
Section 51.014(a)(8) of the Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Code provides
that a person may appeal from an interlocutory order that grants or denies a plea to
the jurisdiction by a governmental unit as that term is defined in section 101.001.
See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(a)(8). The definition of governmental
unit contained in section 101.001 does not include a church. See id. § 101.001(3).
This Court does not have jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals from orders
denying a plea to the jurisdiction unless the plea was brought by a governmental
unit. Alejo, 243 S.W.3d at 25; Cantu Serv., Inc. v. United Freedom Assoc., Inc., 329
S.W.3d 58, 64 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2010, no pet.).
–2–
Accordingly, we dismiss this interlocutory appeal.
/Robert D. Burns, III/
ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE
240518F.P05
–3–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ST. JOHN MISSIONARY BAPTIST On Appeal from the 44th Judicial
CHURCH, INC. OF DALLAS, District Court, Dallas County, Texas
TEXAS, Appellant Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-03833.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice
No. 05-24-00518-CV V. Burns. Justices Molberg and
Pedersen, III participating.
MICHAEL ROLLERSON AND
GLORIA SMITH ROLLERSON,
INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F M.R.,
A MINOR CHILD, Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is
DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
It is ORDERED that appellees MICHAEL ROLLERSON AND GLORIA
SMITH ROLLERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F M.R., A MINOR CHILD
recover their costs of this appeal from appellant ST. JOHN MISSIONARY
BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. OF DALLAS, TEXAS.
Judgment entered July 24, 2024
–4–
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.