CourtListener 10622189•Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC
CourtListener 10622189Txctapp81 juil. 2025
Texte intégral
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
§ No. 08-24-00099-CV
GUILLERMO ACOSTA and
JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the
Appellants, § 261st District Court
v. § of Travis County, Texas
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and (TC# D-1-GN-24-001726)
RASIER, LLC, §
Appellees. §
SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT
The February 28, 2025 judgment of the Court is hereby withdrawn, and the following
judgment is issued in its place to correspond with date of issuance of the substituted opinion.
The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the
judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees
recover from Appellants all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be
certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of July 2025.
LISA J. SOTO, Justice
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.