Michael Shomate and Brianne Shomate v. Servis One, Inc. D/B/A BSI Financial Services

CourtListener 10863093Txctapp921 mai 2026

Texte intégral

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-26-00162-CV
__________________

MICHAEL SHOMATE AND BRIANNE SHOMATE, Appellants

V.

SERVIS ONE, INC. D/B/A BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 25-08-13306
__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Michael Shomate and Brianne Shomate filed a notice of accelerated appeal

from the trial court’s Order on Motions Related to Discovery and Abatement signed

on March 27, 2026. We questioned whether the trial court signed a final judgment

or an interlocutory order that is appealable as an accelerated appeal. The clerk’s

record has been filed, and after reviewing the record, we conclude the record does

not contain a final appealable judgment or an interlocutory order that is appealable.

1
Appellants filed a response to the Clerk’s notice, but their response failed to identify

a statute that authorizes an accelerated appeal at this time.

Generally, in civil cases, appellate courts review only final judgments and

interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. We dismiss this appeal

for want of jurisdiction. 1 See id. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 20, 2026
Opinion Delivered May 21, 2026

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.

1
We note that the Shomates separately filed a mandamus petition that the
Clerk of the Court docketed as No. 09-26-00189-CV, In re Michael A. Shomate and
Brianne K. Shomate.
2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.