In the Matter of K.Y.G. v. the State of Texas

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________
NO. 09-23-00124-CV
________________

IN THE MATTER OF K.Y.G.

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law
Liberty County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 21CC-JUV-00001
________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In July 2021, as a juvenile and pursuant to a plea agreement, K.Y.G. was

found to have engaged in delinquent conduct as defined by Texas Family Code §

51.03(a)(1). See Tex Fam. Code Ann. § 51.03(a)(1). The trial court found that

K.Y.G. “did then and there intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause bodily

injury to [E.A.B-V.] by shooting him in the head, and the defendant did then and

there use or exhibit a deadly weapon, to-wit: a firearm, during the commission of

said assault.” The trial court then committed K.Y.G. to the care, custody and control

1
of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department for a period of eight years. See Tex. Fam.

Code Ann. § 54.04(d)(3). K.Y.G. and his parent waived his right to appeal.

In February 2023, the Texas Juvenile Justice Department notified the trial

court that pursuant to Texas Human Resources Code 244.014(a), after a child is

sixteen-years old, and before the child is nineteen years-old and has not yet

completed his sentence, the Department may request his transfer to the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice. See Tex. Hum. Res. Code Ann. § 244.014(a).1 In

April 2023, the trial court held a hearing regarding the order to transfer and at its

conclusion ordered K.Y.G. to be transferred to the custody of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, for the completion of his eight-year

sentence. After perfecting appeal, appointed counsel filed a brief asserting that the

1
(a) After a child sentenced to commitment under Section 54.04(d)(3),
54.04(m), or 54.05(f), Family Code, becomes 16 years of age but before the child
becomes 19 years of age, the department may refer the child to the juvenile court
that entered the order of commitment for approval of the child’s transfer to the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice for confinement if:

(1) the child has not completed the sentence; and

(2) the child’s conduct, regardless of whether the child was released under
supervision under Section 245.051, indicates that the welfare of the community
requires the transfer.

Tex. Hum. Res. Code Ann. § 244.014, prior version of the statute in effect at the
time of the offense.

2
appeal is frivolous. The brief complies with the requirements of Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1978). The brief concludes that no error that would arguably support an appeal

is presented, a conclusion with which we concur.

The procedures set out in Anders and its Texas progeny apply to juvenile

appeals. In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tex. 1998). Further, in the instant case,

K.Y.G., who is no longer a juvenile, was given the opportunity to file a pro se brief.

As of this date, no pro se brief has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record

and counsel’s brief and find no error requiring us to order appointment of new

counsel. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

JAY WRIGHT
Justice

Submitted on May 22, 2024
Opinion Delivered June 6, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.

3