Eldora James v Best Products Company, Inc., et al.

1812952Vactapp

Texte intégral

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff
ELDORA JAMES
v. 	Record No. 1812-95-2 	MEMORANDUM OPINION*
PER CURIAM
BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. 	MARCH 12, 1996
AND
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS'
COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Thomas Stark, IV; Williamson & Lavecchia,
on brief), for appellant.
(P. Dawn Bishop; Matthew J. Ide; Sands,
Anderson, Marks & Miller, on brief), for
appellees.
Eldora James appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation
Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an
occupational disease. 	Upon reviewing the record and the briefs
of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. 	Rule
5A:27.
This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in
The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___,
___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from
cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or
however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under
the present provisions of the Act").
*Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.
2
Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.
Affirmed.

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

ELDORA JAMES

Vv. Record No. 1812-95-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM
BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. MARCH 12, 1996
AND

TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS '
COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Thomas Stark, IV; Williamson & Lavecchia,
on brief), for appellant.

(P. Dawn Bishop; Matthew J. Ide; Sands,

Anderson, Marks & Miller, on brief), for
appellees.

Eldora James appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation
Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an
occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs
of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule
5A:27.

This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in

The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, Va. , , S.E.2d ,

(1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from
cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or
however defined, are, aS a matter of law, not compensable under

the present provisions of the Act").

"Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.

Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.