Donita Estep v. Virginia Retirement System

1156123Vactapp

Texte intégral

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Elder, Alston and Senior Judge Willis
DONITA ESTEP
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1156-12-3 	PER CURIAM
JANUARY 22, 2013
VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BUCHANAN COUNTY
Henry A. Vanover, Judge
(Jason A. Mullins; Lee & Phipps, P.C., on brief), for appellant.
(Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General; Brian J. Goodman,
Legal Affairs & Compliance Coordinator, on brief), for appellee.
Donita Estep appeals a decision of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County affirming the final
case decision of the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) denying her claim for disability retirement
benefits. On appeal, Estep contends the circuit court erred in: (1) finding substantial evidence
existed in the record to support VRS’s denial of her disability benefits; (2) failing to address VRS’s
violation of its own policy in that it allowed the Medical Board to delegate its responsibilities to an
out-of-state corporation; (3) allowing the independent fact finder to use the Medical Board’s opinion
as evidence; and (4) failing to find VRS failed to adequately inform Estep as to why her claim was
denied. We have reviewed the record, VRS’s final case decision, and the final decision of the
circuit court, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons fully set forth by
the circuit court in its final opinion letter. See Estep v. Virginia Retirement System, Case
No. 343-10 (Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
UNPUBLISHED
- 2 -
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument
would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.