0931062•James J. Rixner v. Richmond (City of) Fire Department
Texte intégral
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis JAMES J. RIXNER MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0931-06-2 PER CURIAM AUGUST 15, 2006 RICHMOND (CITY OF) FIRE DEPARTMENT FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Jamie L. Karek; Geoffrey R. McDonald & Associates, P.C., on brief), for appellant. (Angela C. Fleming; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellee. James J. Rixner appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that he failed to prove the communication of an occupational disease on August 5, 2003. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Rixner v. Richmond (City of) Fire Department, VWC File No. 215-42-36 (Mar. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.