Levi Milton Walker, s/k/a, et al.v Chesterfield Co

2653992Vactapp

Texte intégral

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Bumgardner, Frank and Humphreys
Argued at Richmond, Virginia
LEVI MILTON WALKER, S/K/A
LEVY MILTON WALKER
MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY
v. 	Record No. 2653-99-2 	JUDGE RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III
OCTOBER 10, 2000
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Herbert C. Gill, Jr., Judge
Emmet D. Alexander for appellant.
Larry S. Hogan, Assistant Commonwealth's
Attorney (William W. Davenport,
Commonwealth's Attorney; B. Scott McMichael,
Third Year Law Intern, on brief), for
appellee.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code
§ 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Levi Milton Walker appeals his conviction of driving under
the influence. 	He contends that Chesterfield County improperly
enacted its driving under the influence ordinance. 	Finding no
error, we affirm.
The arrest warrant charged the defendant did "drive or
operate a motor vehicle under the influence of alcoholic
beverages or other self administered intoxicants and/or drugs as
described in Section 18.2-266(I), (II), (III) and/or (IV) 1950
code of Virginia as amended." 	It then cited both the local
ordinance and the state code, "13-1/18.2-266." 	The defendant
pleaded not guilty but stipulated the Commonwealth's evidence
and presented no defense evidence. 	The trial court convicted
the defendant of driving under the influence in violation of
Code § 18.2-266.
The defendant argues the county ordinance was invalid
because the General Assembly amended the code after the county
adopted its ordinance. 	See Code § 46.2-1313. 	However, the
final order clearly states the trial court convicted the
defendant of violating Code § 18.2-266, not of violating the
local ordinance. 	The order from which the defendant appeals
does not reflect the issue he raises. 	We cannot consider the
issue raised because a court speaks only through its orders.
See Cunningham v. Smith, 205 Va. 205, 208, 135 S.E.2d 770, 773
(1964). 	Accordingly, we affirm the conviction.
Affirmed.
- 2 -

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.