State Of Washington, Respondent V. Raymond Allan Elliot, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
RAYMOND ELLIOTT,
Appellant.
DIVISION ONE
No. 71033-8-1
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: 	FEB 1 7 2015
PER CURIAM - Raymond Elliott appeals the sentence imposed following 	Si 	>-
-n 	p
rn
his conviction for second degree burglary. 	He contends, and the State 	c3
concedes, that his offender score should have been 12 instead of 13. 	The 	_^
parties also agree that the standard range is the same whether the score is 12 or
13. 	In such circumstances, the scoring error is harmless. 	State v. Arao. 81 Wn.
App. 552, 569, 915 P.2d 1103 (1996) (error in calculating offender score was
harmless where standard range would be the same under proper score); State v.
Priest. 147 Wn. App. 662, 673, 196 P.3d 763 (2008). 	Nevertheless, because the
incorrect judgment and sentence should be corrected, we remand solely for the
court to correct the offender score on the judgment and sentence.
Remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence.
as
FOR THE COURT:
)<e^(As^<s~
Oak, J 	y