issue-1997-05-19•Federal Register proposed rules — 1997-05-19
Federal Register proposed rules — 1997-05-19
issue-1997-05-19Federal Register proposed rules — 1997-05-19Proposed Regulation
Published Federal Register documents, not public-inspection drafts. The GPO XML/text rendition is a research aid; the linked complete official PDF retains the printed layout and all graphics. Graphics are retained in that PDF and are not independently reproduced in this text rendition. Publication does not establish that every provision remains legally in force.
FR Doc. 97-13130 Federal Acquisition Regulation; Reform of Affirmative Action in Federal procurement; and Part 15 Rewrite: Contracting by Negotiation; Competitive Range Determinations; Corrections
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-13130]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
19, 24, 25, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 42, 43, 44, 45, 49, 50,
52, and 53
[FAR Case 97-004 and 95-029]
RINs 9000-AH59 and 9000-AH21
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Reform of Affirmative Action in
Federal procurement; and Part 15 Rewrite: Contracting by Negotiation;
Competitive Range Determinations; Corrections
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Corrrections to proposed rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Acquisition Policy Division's FAR Secretariat is
issuing a correction to two Federal Acquisition Regulation proposed
rules published on Friday, May 9, 1997, at 62 FR 25786, and Wednesday,
May 14, 1997, at 62 FR 26640, respectively. Both of those proposed
rules need to reflect a revised E-mail address for sending in comments
over the Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Beverly Fayson at (202) 501-4755, General Services Administration,
FAR Secretariat, Washington, DC 20405.
Corrections
1. At 62 FR 25786, in the first column the first sentence of the
last paragraph should read: ``E-mail comments submitted over the
Internet should be addressed to: [email protected]''.
2. At 62 FR 26640, in the second column, starting in the sixth
line, the sentence should read: ``E-mail comments submitted over the
Internet should be addressed to: [email protected]''.
Signed: May 14, 1997.
Edward C. Loeb,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 97-13130 Filed 5-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-M
Complete official Federal Register PDF
FR Doc. 97-13082 Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company Model R22 Helicopters
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27211-27212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-13082]
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 96 / Monday, May 19, 1997 / Proposed
Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-SW-04-AD]
Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company Model R22
Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to Robinson Helicopter Company
(Robinson) Model R22 helicopters with a Lycoming O-360-J2A engine
installation. This proposal would require replacing the carburetor and
carburetor air temperature (CAT) gage with an improved carburetor that
does not require manual leaning of the fuel/air mixture during flight,
and a remarked CAT gage; and revising the Rotorcraft Flight Manual to
remove the reference to leaning the engine. This proposal is prompted
by a report from the Civil Aviation Authority of Great Britain that
cautioned that the mixture control could inadvertently be placed in the
idle cutoff position during in-flight manual leaning of the fuel/air
mixture in the carburetor of the Lycoming O-360-J2A engine. The actions
specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent inadvertent
placement of the mixture control to the idle cutoff position during in-
flight leaning of the engine, which could result in an engine shutdown
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 18, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention:
Rules Docket No. 97-SW-04-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137. Comments may be inspected at this location between 9:00
a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Robinson Helicopter Company, 2901 Airport Drive,
Torrance, California 90505. This information may be examined at the
FAA, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room
663, Fort Worth, Texas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth Bumann, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Propulsion
Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712, telephone
(562) 627-5265, fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket No. 97-SW-04-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 97-SW-04-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.
Discussion
This document proposes the adoption of a new AD that is applicable
to Robinson Model R22 helicopters, serial numbers (S/N) 2571 through
2664. This proposal would require replacing the MA-4-5 carburetor and
CAT gage, part number (P/N) C604-6, with an airworthy MA-4SPA
carburetor and CAT gage, P/N A606-2; and mandating the Robinson Model
R22 Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) revision dated February 6, 1997 be
inserted into the RFM. These revised supplements to the RFM do not
provide for leaning of the carburetor mixture. This proposal is
prompted by a report from the Civil Aviation Authority of Great Britain
that cautioned that the mixture control could inadvertently be placed
in the idle cutoff position during in-flight leaning of the O-360-J2A
engine. This condition, if not corrected, could result in inadvertent
placement of the mixture control to the idle cutoff position during in-
flight leaning of the engine, which could result in an engine shutdown
during flight and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
The FAA has reviewed Robinson Helicopter Company R22 Service
Bulletin SB-82, dated March 3, 1997, and Robinson Helicopter Company
KI-114 O-360 Engine Carburetor Change Kit instructions, Revision A,
dated March 6, 1997, which describe procedures for removing the MA-4-5
carburetor and the CAT gage, P/N C604-6, and replacing them with an
airworthy MA-4SPA carburetor and CAT gage, P/N A604-2, and revising the
RFM Section 9, Supplements 7 (for Beta II) and 8 (for Mariner II) to
eliminate the leaning procedure.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other Robinson Model R22 helicopters of the same
type design, the proposed AD would require, within 50 hours time-in-
service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, removing the MA-4-5
carburetor and CAT gage, P/N C604-6, replacing them with an airworthy
MA-4SPA carburetor and
[[Page 27212]]
CAT gage, P/N A604-2, and revising the RFM. The actions would be
required to be accomplished in accordance with the service bulletin
compliance procedures and kit instructions described previously.
The FAA estimates that 50 helicopters of U.S. registry would be
affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 5 work
hours per helicopter to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts would cost
approximately $3,641 per helicopter. Based on these figures, the total
cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$197,050.
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
Robinson Helicopter Company: Docket No. 97-SW-04-AD.
Applicability: Model R22 helicopters, serial numbers (S/N) 2571
through 2664, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority
provided in paragraph (c) to request approval from the FAA. This
approval may address either no action, if the current configuration
eliminates the unsafe condition, or different actions necessary to
address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request
should include an assessment of the effect of the changed
configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no
case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair
remove any helicopter from the applicability of this AD.
Compliance: Required within 50 hours time-in-service after the
effective date of this AD, unless accomplished previously.
To prevent inadvertent placement of the mixture control to the
idle cutoff position during in-flight leaning of the engine, which
could result in an engine shutdown during flight and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Remove the MA-4-5 carburetor and carburetor air temperature
(CAT) gage, part number (P/N) C604-6, and replace them with an
airworthy MA-4SPA carburetor and remarked CAT gage, P/N A604-2, in
accordance with Robinson Helicopter Company R22 Service Bulletin SB-
82, dated March 3, 1997, and Robinson Helicopter Company KI-114 O-
360 Engine Carburetor Change Kit instructions, Revision A, dated
March 6, 1997.
(b) Upon completion of paragraph (a) of this AD, insert the FAA-
approved R22 Pilot's Operating Handbook Section 9, Supplements 7
(R22 Beta II) and 8 (R22 Mariner II), revised February 6, 1997, or a
later FAA-approved revision, into the R22 Rotorcraft Flight Manual.
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then
send it to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 8, 1997.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-13082 Filed 5-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Complete official Federal Register PDF
FR Doc. 97-13071 Proposed Modification to the Saipan Class D Airspace Area; CQ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27212-27214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-13071]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Airspace Docket No. 96-AWP-6]
Proposed Modification to the Saipan Class D Airspace Area; CQ
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify the Saipan, CQ, Class D
airspace area. Specifically, this action proposes to raise the ceiling
of the existing Class D airspace area from 2,500 feet mean sea level
(MSL) to 2,700 feet MSL. The FAA proposes this action to enhance safety
and better manage air traffic operations into and out of the Saipan
International Airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 7, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on the proposal in triplicate to: Manager, Air
Traffic Division, AWP-500, Docket No. 96-AWP-6, Federal Aviation
Administration, P. O. Box 92007, Worldway Postal Center, Los Angeles,
CA 90009.
The official docket may be examined in the Rules Docket, Office of
the Chief Counsel, Room 915, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC, weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
An informal docket may also be examined during normal business
hours at the office of the Regional Air Traffic Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William C. Nelson, Airspace and Rules
Division, ATA-400, Office of Air Traffic Airspace Management, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20591; telephone: (202) 267-8783.
[[Page 27213]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify the airspace docket number and be
submitted in triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing
the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must
submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which
the following statement is made: ``Comments to Airspace Docket No. 96-
AWP-6.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the
commenter. All communications received on or before the specified
closing date for comments will be considered before taking action on
the proposed rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed
in light of comments received. All comments submitted will be available
for examination in the Rules Docket both before and after the closing
date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRM's
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Air Traffic Airspace
Management, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or by
calling (202) 267-8783. Communications must identify the notice number
of this NPRM. Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for
future NPRM's should call the FAA's Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267-
9677, for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment to part 71 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to modify the Saipan Class D
airspace area. Specifically, this action would raise the existing
ceiling of the Saipan Class D airspace area from 2,500 feet MSL to
2,700 feet MSL. This proposal would provide additional controlled
airspace for the instrument approach procedures into Saipan. The FAA is
proposing this action to enhance safety and better manage air traffic
operations into and out of the Saipan International Airport. Class D
airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000 of FAA Order
7400.9D dated September 4, 1996, and effective September 16, 1996,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D airspace
area designation listed in this document would be published
subsequently in this Order.
The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
ICAO Considerations
As part of this proposal relates to navigable airspace outside the
United States, this notice is submitted in accordance with the ICAO
International Standards and Recommended Practices. Applicability of
International Standards and Recommended Practices by the Office of Air
Traffic Airspace Management, FAA, in areas outside domestic airspace of
the United States is governed by Article 12 of, and Annex 11 to, the
Convention on International Civil Aviation, which pertains to the
establishment of air navigational facilities and services necessary to
promote the safe, orderly, and expeditious flow of civil air traffic.
Their purpose is to ensure that civil aircraft operations on
international air routes are carried out under uniform conditions
designed to improve the safety and efficiency of air operations.
The International Standards and Recommended Practices in Annex 11
apply in those parts of the airspace under the jurisdiction of a
contracting state, derived from ICAO, wherein air traffic services are
provided and also whenever a contracting state accepts the
responsibility of providing air traffic services over high seas or in
airspace of undetermined sovereignty. A contracting state accepting
such responsibility may apply the International Standards and
Recommended Practices in a manner consistent with that adopted for
airspace under its domestic jurisdiction.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, Chicago, 1944, state aircraft are exempt from the
provisions of Annex 11 and its Standards and Recommended Practices. As
a contracting state, the United States agreed by Article 3(d) that its
state aircraft will be operated in international airspace with due
regard for the safety of civil aircraft.
Since this action involves, in part, the designation of navigable
airspace outside the United States, the Administrator is consulting
with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense in accordance
with the provisions of Executive Order 10854.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 71) as follows:
PART 71--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9D, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated September 4, 1996, and effective September 16,
1996, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 5000--Class D Airspace Areas
* * * * *
AWP CQ D Saipan, CQ [Revised]
Saipan International Airport (Primary Airport)
(lat. 15 deg.07'08'' N, long. 145 deg.43'46'' E)
Saipan RBN
(lat. 15 deg.06'41'' N, long. 145 deg.42'37'' E)
That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,700 feet MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of Saipan International
Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
[[Page 27214]]
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory, Chart Supplement/
Pacific.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 1997.
Nancy B. Kalinowski,
Acting Program Director for Air Traffic Airspace Management.
[FR Doc. 97-13071 Filed 5-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Complete official Federal Register PDF
FR Doc. 97-13048 HUD Building Products Standards and Certification ProgramUse of Materials Bulletins
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27486-27491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-13048]
[[Page 27485]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part VIII
Department of Housing and Urban Development
_______________________________________________________________________
24 CFR Part 200
HUD Building Products Standards and Certification Program--Use of
Materials Bulletins; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 96 / Monday, May 19, 1997 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 27486]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 200
[Docket No. FR-4137-P-01]
RIN 2502-AG84
HUD Building Products Standards and Certification Program--Use of
Materials Bulletins
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would adopt a number of Use of Materials
Bulletins (UM) and references related to national voluntary consensus
standards in accordance with OMB Circular 119A. It also supplements the
HUD Building Product Standards and Certification Program by requiring
that additional information be included on the label, tag, or mark that
each manufacturer affixes to the certified product. The labeling of
these products is in the public interest because it will allow
consumers to readily identify those products that comply with existing
voluntary consensus standards. In addition, the adoption of a UM for a
product eliminates the need for manufacturers to seek HUD acceptance
through ``Materials Releases'' for individual products that meet the
standard of a UM. HUD accepts products that use on a generic basis for
use in houses covered under HUD mortgage insurance programs, thus
streamlining Departmental requirements. In addition, this proposed rule
specifies the frequency with which products should be tested in order
to be acceptable to HUD; and modifies section (d)(4)(ii) of 24 CFR
200.935 to allow the use of American Society for Quality Controls
(ASQC) standards 9000-94, 9001-94, 9002-94, 9003-94, & 9004-94 as
voluntary guidelines in any quality review.
DATES: Comment due date: July 18, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Rules Docket Clerk, Office of the General
Counsel, Room 10276, Department of Housing & Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20410-8000. Communication should
refer to the above docket number and title. A copy of each
communication submitted will be available for public inspection and
copying between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. weekdays at the above address.
FAXED comments will not be accepted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Williamson, Director, Office
of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street S.W., Room 9156, Washington, D.C.
20410-8000; telephone: voice, (202) 708-6423; TTY, (202) 708-4594
(these are not toll free numbers.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to HUD's Building Product Standards
and Certification Programs, authorized by Section 521 of the National
Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1735e, the Department issues Use of Materials
Bulletins (UMs). The Use of Materials Bulletins are issued in the
public interest, to provide HUD standards that establish minimum
acceptable qualities for certain materials and products to be used in
properties subject to mortgages insured by the Department. In
accordance with 24 CFR 200.935, UMs are also used in third-party
labeling and certification programs to assure that building products
used in HUD programs meet the appropriate national voluntary standards.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development issues ``Materials
Releases'' to individual manufacturers for the specific acceptance of
new or innovative building products where there are no existing
standards. ``Use of Materials Bulletins'' are also issued by the
Department for the acceptance of new products on a generic or class
basis, thus making it unnecessary for individual manufacturers to
continue applying for approval of similar products, and making the
approval process overall much less cumbersome. This proposed rule
permits public comment prior to the issuance of a Use of Materials
Bulletin.
Materials Releases are periodically renewed or revised, for a fee,
by the Department. In cases where there are many manufacturers of
similar new products, or standards developed that cover these products,
the Department cancels the Materials Releases and refers to the new
standard and a certification program in a Use of Materials Bulletin.
With the promulgation of a Use of Materials Bulletin, individual
manufacturers no longer have to pay a fee to the Department for the
maintenance of their Materials Releases, and the Department no longer
has the administrative burden of renewing or revising the individual
Materials Releases. For these reasons, in the future, the Department
anticipates increasing its reliance on Use of Materials Bulletins to
accept new or innovative building products.
This proposed rule would promulgate or revise the following Use of
Materials Bulletins:
UM 73b Plastic Plumbing Fixtures at Sec. 200.937.
UM 44e Carpet at Sec. 200.942.
UM 38j Grademarking of Lumber at Sec. 200.943.
UM 40c Plywood at Sec. 200.944.
UM 72b Carpet Cushion at Sec. 200.948.
UM 105 Elastomeric Joint Sealants at Sec. 200.951.
UM 70b Particleboard Stair Treads at Sec. 200.952.
UM 110 Sprayed Polyurethane Foam Roof Insulation at Sec. 200.953.
UM 60a Construction Adhesives for Field Glued Wood Floor Systems at
Sec. 200.954.
UM 111 Fenestration Products (Windows and Doors) at Sec. 200.955.
Third-party certification programs for elastomeric joint sealants
and sprayed polyurethane foam for roof insulation have been informally
accepted by the Department, and by this rule are designated as new
Bulletins UM 105 and UM 110 under the procedures of 24 CFR 200.935.
In addition, paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of 24 CFR 200.935 is being
modified to allow the use of American Society for Quality Control
standards 9000-94, 9001-94, 9002-94, 9003-94, and 9004-94 as voluntary
guidelines in any quality review. These standards are identical to the
International Standards Organization standards. This change is
necessary because no criteria currently exist for a HUD determination
of an acceptable quality assurance program.
The Department has evaluated the updated technical standards
prepared by national standards organizations, and plans to adopt these
standards by incorporating them in the UM by reference. The UMs adopted
would also augment the labeling requirements of 24 CFR 200.935(d)(6).
In addition, the Department is also requesting comments on the
frequency of testing specified for each third party certification
program.
The reference in Sec. 900.929(b)(2) to the MPS compilation is
updated to cite the 1994 edition.
Copies of UMs are available for public inspection during regular
business hours in the Office of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 9156, 451 Seventh
Street S.W., Washington, DC., 20410-8000.
Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, issued by the President on
[[Page 27487]]
September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Any changes to the
proposed rule resulting from this review are available for public
inspection between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. weekdays in the Office of
the Rules Docket Clerk.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
The proposed information collection requirements contained at
Secs. 900.937, 900.942, 900.943, 900.944, 900.948, 900.951, 900.952,
900.953, 900.954, and 900.955 of this rule have been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, under section 3507(d)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless the collection displays
a valid control number.
(a) Estimate of the total reporting and recordkeeping burden that
will result from the collection of information:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Est. avg. Est. annual
Reporting Burden Number of Freq. of response burden
respondents response time (hrs.) (hrs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20 20 1 400
---------------------------------------------------
Totaling Reporting Burden............................. ........... ........... ........... 400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the Department is
soliciting comments from members of the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of information to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding the
information collection requirements in this proposal. Under the
provisions of 5 CFR part 1320, OMB is required to make a decision
concerning this collection of information between 30 and 60 days after
today's publication date. Therefore, a comment on the information
collection requirements is best assured of having its full effect if
OMB receives the comment within 30 days of today's publication. This
time frame does not affect the deadline for comments to the agency on
the proposed rule, however. Comments must refer to the proposal by name
and docket number (FR-4137) and must be sent to: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr.
HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the
private sector. This proposed rule does not impose any Federal mandates
on any State, local or tribal governments or the private sector within
the meaning of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Environmental Impact
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment
has been made in accordance with HUD regulations in 24 CFR Part 50,
which implement Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332. The Finding of No Significant Impact is
available for public inspection and copying between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30
p.m. weekdays in the Office of the Rules Docket Clerk, Room 10276, 451
Seventh Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20410.
Impact on Small Entities
The Secretary, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)) has reviewed and approved this proposed rule, and in so
doing certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. These Use of
Materials Bulletins adopt standards that are nationally recognized
throughout the affected industry and will not create a burden on
manufacturers currently meeting the standards. The proposed rule will
have no adverse or disproportionate economic impact on small
businesses.
Federalism Impact
The General Counsel has determined, as the Designated Official for
HUD under section 6(a) of Executive Order 12612, Federalism, that this
proposed rule does not have federalism implications concerning the
division of local, State, and federal responsibilities. The rule only
proposes to adopt standards that are already nationally recognized
throughout the affected industry.
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This proposed rule will not pose an environmental health risk or
safety risk on children.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 200
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Equal employment
opportunity, Fair housing, Home improvement, Housing standards,
Incorporation by reference, Lead poisoning, Loan programs--housing and
community development, Minimum property standards, Mortgage insurance,
Organization and functions (Government agencies), Penalties, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Social security, Unemployment
compensation, Wages.
Accordingly, 24 CFR part 200 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 200--INTRODUCTION
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 200 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Titles I and II of the National Housing Act (12
U.S.C. 1701 through 1715z-18); sec. 7(d), Department of Housing and
Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3535 (d)).
2. In Sec. 200.929, paragraph (b)(2) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 200.929 Description and identification of minimum property
standards.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) MPS for Housing 4910.1, 1994 edition. This volume applies to
buildings and sites designed and used for normal multifamily occupancy,
[[Page 27488]]
including both unsubsidized and subsidized insured housing, and to
care-type housing insured under the National Housing Act. It also
includes, in Appendix K, a reprint of the MPS for One and Two Family
Dwellings identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
3. Section 200.931 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 200.931 Statement of availability.
Updated copies of the Minimum Property Standards and Use of
Materials Bulletins are available for public examination in the Office
of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, room 9156, 451 Seventh St. S.W., Washington, D.C. 20410-
8000, and at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol
Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, D.C., 20408. In addition, copies of
volumes 1, 2, and 3 of the Minimum Property Standards may be purchased
from the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
4. In Sec. 200.935, paragraph (d)(4)(ii) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 200.935 Administrator qualifications and procedures for HUD
building products certification programs.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Quality assurance system review. (A) Each administrator shall
examine a participating manufacturer's facilities and quality assurance
system procedures to determine that they are adequate to assure
continuing production of the product that complies with the applicable
standard. These quality assurance systems procedures shall be
documented in the administrator's and the manufacturer's files. If a
manufacturer's quality assurance system is not satisfactory to the
administrator, validation of the manufacturer's declaration of
certification shall be withheld. The following American Society for
Quality Control (ASQC) standards, which are incorporated by reference
and which are identical to the International Standards Organization
standards, may be used as guidelines in any quality assurance review:
(1) ASQC Q 9000-94 Quality Management and Quality Assurance
Standards Guidelines for Selection and Use;
(2) ASQC Q 9001-94 Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance in
Design, Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing;
(3) ASQC Q 9002-94 Quality Systems-Model for Quality in Production
and Installation;
(4) ASQC Q 9003-94 Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance in
Final Inspection and Test;
(5) ASQC Q 9004-94 Quality Management and Quality System Elements-
Guidelines.
(B) These standards have been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. They are available from the American
Society for Quality Control (ASQC), 310 West Wisconsin Avenue,
Milwaukee, WI 53208.
* * * * *
5. Section 200.937 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 200.937 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standards and certification program for plastic
plumbing fixtures.
(a) Applicable standards. (1) All plastic plumbing fixtures shall
be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with the following
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards, which are
incorporated by reference:
(i) ANSI Z 124.1-95 Plastic Bathtub Units;
(ii) ANSI Z 124.2-95 Plastic Shower Receptors;
(iii) ANSI Z 124.3-95 Plastic Lavatories;
(iv) ANSI Z 124.4-96 Plastic Water Closets, Bowls, & Tanks;
(v) ANSI Z 124.6-90 Plastic Sinks; and
(vi) ANSI Z 124.7-93 Plastic Spa Shells.
(2) These standards have been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. They are available from the American
National Standards Institute, Inc., 11 West 42nd Street, New York, New
York 10036.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standards are required to be on the certification label
issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. Each plastic plumbing
fixture shall be marked as conforming to UM 73b. The label shall be
located on each plastic plumbing fixture so that it is available for
inspection. The label shall include the manufacturer's name and plant
location.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance inspections. Under the
procedures concerning periodic tests and quality assurance inspections,
the frequency of testing for a product shall be described in the
specific building product certification program. In the case of plastic
plumbing fixtures, testing and inspection shall be conducted as
follows:
(1) At least every year, the administrator shall visit the
manufacturer's facility to select a sample of each certified plastic
plumbing fixture for testing in a laboratory accredited by the National
Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) of the U.S.
Department of Commerce.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance
procedures once a year to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
Secs. 200.938, 200.939, and 200.941 [Removed]
6. Sections 200.938, 200.939, and 200.941 are removed.
7. Section 200.942 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 200.942 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standards and certification program for carpets and
carpets with attached cushions.
(a) Applicable standards. (1) All carpets and carpets with attached
cushions shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with
the following standards:
(i) ASTM D297-95 Standard Test Method for Rubber Products-Chemical
Analysis;
(ii) ASTM D5848-95 Standard Test Method for Mass per Unit Area of
Pile Floor Coverings;
(iii) ASTM D1335-72 Standard Test Method for Pile Floor Coverings;
(iv) ASTM D3936-90 Test Method for Delamination of Secondary
Backing of Pile Coverings;
(v) ASTM D2646-95 Test Method for Backing Fabrics;
(vi) AATCC 16E-93 Test Method for Colorfastness to Light-Xenon; and
(vii) AATCC 165-93 Test for Crocking.
(2) These standards have been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. They are available from the American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428; the American Association of Textile
Chemists and Colorists (AATCC), P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park,
NC 27709; U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST, NVLAP, Gaithersburg, MD
20899.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6)
[[Page 27489]]
concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's validation mark
and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with the applicable
standards are required to be on the certification label issued by the
administrator to the manufacturer. Each carpet shall be marked at
intervals of at least 6 feet and no less than 1 foot from the edge, in
compliance with UM 44e. The label shall include the manufacturer's
name, plant location, and statement of compliance with UM 44e.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance inspections.
Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR 200.935(d)(8) concerning
periodic tests and quality assurance inspections, the frequency of
testing for a product shall be described in the specific building
product certification program. In the case of carpet and carpet with
attached cushion, testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows:
(1) Two samples of each certified quality shall be taken every six
months from the manufacturer and one sample annually from the public
marketplace for testing in a laboratory accredited by the National
Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) of the U.S.
Department of Commerce.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality procedures
twice a year to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
(d) Cut pile polypropylene carpet. Provisions for cut pile
polypropylene are included under UM 44e.
8. Section 200.943 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 200.943 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standards and certification program for the
grademarking of lumber.
(a) Applicable Standard. (1) In accordance with UM 38j, lumber
shall be grademarked in compliance with the U.S. Department of Commerce
Voluntary Product Standard PS-20-94 American Softwood Lumber Standard.
(2) This standard has been approved by the Director of the Federal
Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. It is available from U.S. Department of
Commerce, American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC), P.O. Box 210,
Germantown, Maryland 20875-0210.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standard are required on the certification label issued
by the administrator to the manufacturer. The certification mark shall
be affixed to each piece of lumber. In the case of grademarking of
lumber, the following information shall be included on the
certification label or mark:
(1) The registered symbol which identifies the grading agency;
(2) Species or species combination;
(3) Grade;
(4) Identification of the applicable grading rules when not
indicated by the species identification or agency symbol;
(5) Mill or grader;
(6) For members which are less than 5 inches in nominal thickness,
indication that the lumber was green or dry at the time of dressing;
and
(7) Indication that the lumber was finger jointed.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance. Periodic tests and
quality assurance inspections shall be carried out by the American
Lumber Standard Committee as defined in PS 20-94.
9. Section 200.944 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 200.944 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standards and certification program for plywood and
other wood-based structural-use panels.
(a) Applicable standards. (1) All plywood prescriptively designed,
manufactured, and tested shall be in compliance with the U.S.
Department of Commerce Voluntary Product Standard PS 1-95. Plywood
panels not meeting the grade requirements of PS 1-95 and all composite
and non-veneer structural-use panels shall comply with the
``Performance Standards and Policies for Structural-Use Panels-94''
(APA Standard PRP 108-94 or TECO Standard PRP 133-94) except that the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard ASTM D 3043-
87 Method B may be used.
(2) These standards have been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. They are available from the U.S.
Department of Commerce, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899; APA-The
Engineered Wood Association, 7011 South 19th St., Tacoma, WA 98411;
TECO/PFS Inc., 2402 Daniels Street, Madison, WI 53704; American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standards are required to be on the certification label
issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. All plywood panels
made to PS 1-95 prescriptive or performance standards shall be marked
as complying to PS 1-95. All plywood products not meeting the
requirements of PS 1-95 and all composite and non-veneer structural-use
panels that do not comply with APA PRP 108-94 or TECO PRP 133-94 shall
be marked as complying with UM 40c. The label shall be located on each
panel so that it is available for inspection. The label shall include
the manufacturer's name and mill number.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance. Under the procedures
concerning periodic tests and quality assurance inspections, the
frequency of testing for a product shall be described in the specific
building product certification program. In the case of plywood and
other wood-based structural-use panels, testing and inspection shall be
conducted as follows:
(1) At least three times a year, the administrator shall visit the
manufacturer's facility to select 10 panels of each certified product
for testing in a laboratory accredited by the National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) of the U.S. Department of
Commerce.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance
procedures three times a year to assure that they are being followed by
the manufacturer.
10. Section 200.948 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 200.948 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standards and certification program for carpet
cushion.
(a) Applicable standards. (1) All carpet cushion shall be designed,
manufactured, and tested in compliance with the following standards:
(i) ASTM D3574-95 Test Method for Flexible Cellular Materials;
(ii) ASTM D297-95 Standard Test Method for Rubber Products Chemical
Analysis;
(iii) ASTM D629-95 Test Methods for Quantitative Analysis of
Textiles;
(iv) ASTM D1667-90 Specification for Flexible Cellular Materials;
(v) ASTM D2646-95 Test Method for Backing Fabrics;
(vi) ASTM D3696-90 Test Method for Delamination of Secondary
Backing of Pile Coverings.
(2) These standards have been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and
[[Page 27490]]
1 CFR part 51. They are available from the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania 19428.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standards are required to be on the certification label
issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. Each carpet cushion
shall be marked as to type and class, and as conforming to UM 72b.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance. Under the procedures set
forth in 200.935(d)(8), testing and inspection shall be conducted as
follows:
(1) At least twice a year, the administrator shall visit the
manufacturer's facility to select a sample of each certified carpet
cushion for testing by a laboratory approved by the administrator.
(2) The administrator shall review the quality assurance procedures
every six months to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
11. A new Sec. 200.951 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 200.951 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standard and certification program for elastomeric
joint sealants.
(a) Applicable standards. (1) All elastomeric joint sealants shall
be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with the following
American Society for Testing and Materials standards:
(i) ASTM C920-94 Standard Specification for Elastomeric Joint
Sealants, except that there be a maximum of 25% loss of elongation when
determined after curing and 2500 hours of ultra-violet light in a xenon
arc accelerated weathering test for Class 25 materials compared to a
cured non-exposed sample;
(ii) ASTM C1193-91 Standard Guide for the Use of Elastomeric
Sealants.
(2) These standards have been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. They are available from the American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standards are required to be on the certification label
issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. Each container of
elastomeric joint sealant shall include the sealant's type, grade,
class, and use, and the manufacturer's name, plant location and
statement of compliance with UM 105.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance inspections. Under the
procedures set forth in 24 CFR 200.935(d)(8) concerning periodic tests
and quality assurance inspections, the frequency of testing for a
product shall be described in the specific building product
certification program. In the case of elastomeric joint sealants,
testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows:
(1) At least once every year, the administrator shall visit the
manufacturer's facility to select a sample for testing in a laboratory
accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NVLAP) of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance
procedures once a year to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
12. A new Sec. 200.952 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 200.952 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standards and certification program for interior
particleboard stair treads.
(a) Applicable standards. (1) All interior particleboard stair
treads shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with
ANSI A208.1 Mat-Formed Wood Particleboard, Grade M-3.
(2) This standard has been approved by the Director of the Federal
Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51, and is available from the American National
Standards Institute, Inc., 11 West 42nd Street, New York, New York
10036.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standard are required to be on the certification label
issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. Each interior
particleboard stair tread shall include the manufacturer's statement of
conformance to UM 70b, a statement that this product is for interior
use only, and the manufacturer's name and plant location.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance. Under the procedures set
forth in 24 CFR 200.935(d)(8) concerning periodic tests and quality
assurance inspections, the frequency of testing for a product shall be
described in the specific building product certification program. In
the case of interior particleboard stair treads, testing and inspection
shall be conducted as follows:
(1) At least once every three months, the administrator shall visit
the manufacturer's facility to select a sample for testing in a
laboratory approved by the administrator.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance
procedures twice a year to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
13. A new Sec. 200.953 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 200.953 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standards and certification program for sprayed
polyurethane foam for roof insulation.
(a) Applicable standards. (1) All sprayed polyurethane foam for
roof insulation shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in
compliance with ASTM C1029-93 Standard Specification for Spray Applied
Rigid Cellular Polyurethane Thermal Insulation. The foam shall be
installed in accordance with ASTM D5469-93 Standard Guide for
Application of New Spray Applied Polyurethane Foam and Coated Roofing
Systems, and designed in accordance with the Society of the Plastics
Industry (SPI) standard PFCD AY 104-90 Recommended Design
Considerations and Guide Specifications.
(2) These standards have been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. They are available from the American
National Standards Institute, Inc., 11 West 42nd Street, New York, New
York 10036, or the Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI), 1275 K
Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, D.C., 20005.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standard are required to be on the certification label
issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. Each container or
package of sprayed polyurethane foam roof insulation
[[Page 27491]]
material shall be marked as conforming to UM 110. The label shall
include the manufacturer's name and plant location.
(c) Periodic tests and quality assurance inspections. Under the
procedures set forth in 24 CFR 200.935(d)(8) concerning periodic tests
and quality assurance inspections, the frequency of testing for a
product shall be described in the specific building product
certification program. In the case of sprayed polyurethane foam for
room insulation, testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows:
(1) At least twice a year, the administrator shall visit the
manufacturer's facility to select a sample for testing in an approved
laboratory with the applicable standard.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance
procedures twice a year to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
14. A new Sec. 200.954 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 200.954 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standard and certification program for flooring
adhesives.
(a) Applicable Standards. (1) All construction adhesives for field
glued wood floor systems shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in
compliance with the following American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) standard D3498-93 Specifications for Adhesive for
Field-Gluing Plywood to Lumber Framing for Floor Systems except that
the mold and bacteria resistance tests shall not be included.
(2) This standard has been approved by the Director of the Federal
Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51, and is available from the American Society
for Testing & Materials Inc., 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken,
PA. 19428.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the Administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standard are required to be on the certification label
issued by the Administrator to the manufacturer. Each container shall
be marked as being in compliance with UM 60a. The label shall also
include the manufacturer's name, plant location, and shelf life.
(c) Periodic Tests and Quality Assurance. Under the procedures set
forth in 24 CFR 200.935(d)(8) concerning periodic tests and quality
assurance inspections, the frequency of testing for a product shall be
described in the specific building product certification program. In
the case of construction adhesives for field glued wood floor systems,
testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows:
(1) At least every six months, the administrator shall visit the
manufacturer's facility to select a sample for testing in a laboratory
approved by the administrator.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance
procedures twice a year to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
15. A new Sec. 200.955 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 200.955 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD
building product standard and certification program for fenestration
products (windows and doors).
(a) Applicable Standards. (1) All windows and doors shall be
designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with American
Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) standard, AAMA 101/
I.S.2-97, Voluntary Specifications for Aluminum, Vinyl (PVC), and Wood
Windows and Glass Doors.
(2) This standard has been approved by the Director of the Federal
Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51, and is available from the American
Architectural Manufacturers Association, 1540 East Dundee Road,
Paletine, IL 60067.
(b) Labeling. Under the procedures set forth in 24 CFR
200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's
validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with
the applicable standards are required to be on the certification label
issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. Each window or glass
door shall include the manufacturer's name, plant location, and
statement of compliance with UM 111.
(c) Periodic Tests and Quality Assurance Inspections. Under the
procedures set forth in 24 CFR 200.935(d)(8) concerning periodic tests
and quality assurance inspections, the frequency of testing for a
product shall be described in the specific building product
certification program. In the case of windows and glass doors, testing
and inspection shall be conducted as follows:
(1) At least once every four years, the administrator shall visit
the manufacturer's facility to select a commercial sample for testing
in a laboratory approved by the administrator.
(2) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance
procedures twice a year to assure that they are being followed by the
manufacturer.
Dated: March 7, 1997.
Nicolas P. Retsinas,
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner
[FR Doc. 97-13048 Filed 5-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-27-P
Complete official Federal Register PDF
FR Doc. 97-13018 Magnuson Act Provisions; Essential Fish Habitat; Public Meetings; Extension of Comment Period
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27214-27215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-13018]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 600
[I.D. 120996A]
Magnuson Act Provisions; Essential Fish Habitat; Public Meetings;
Extension of Comment Period
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Public meetings; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the extension of the public comment period on
the proposed regulations containing guidelines for the description and
identification of essential fish habitat (EFH) in fishery management
plans. The public comment period is hereby extended to June 6, 1997, to
give members of the public additional time to review and comment on the
proposed regulation. NMFS also announces an additional public meeting
to be held in Charleston, SC. This meeting is added to provide an
opportunity in the South Atlantic for public comment on the EFH
proposed regulations.
DATES: Written comments will be accepted on or before June 6, 1997. The
additional public meeting is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, May 28,
1997, at 7 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Requests for special accommodations and comments should be
addressed to Office of Habitat Conservation, Attention: EFH, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282; telephone: 301/713-
2325. The additional public meeting will be held at Town and Country
Inn,
[[Page 27215]]
2008 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Crockett, NMFS, 301/713-2325.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS issued proposed regulations containing guidelines for the
description and identification of EFH in fishery management plans,
adverse impacts on EFH, and actions to conserve and enhance EFH on
April 23, 1997 (62 FR 19723). The regulations would also provide a
process for NMFS to coordinate and consult with Federal and state
agencies on activities that may adversely affect EFH. The guidelines
are required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The purpose of the rule is to
assist fishery management councils in fulfilling the requirements set
out by the Magnuson-Stevens Act to amend their fishery management plans
to describe and identify EFH, minimize adverse effects on EFH, and
identify other actions to conserve and enhance EFH. The purpose of the
coordination and consultation provisions is to specify procedures for
adequate consultation with NMFS on activities that may adversely affect
EFH.
Special Accommodations
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Lee Crockett (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 days
prior to the meeting date.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 13, 1997.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Habitat Conservation, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-13018 Filed 5-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Complete official Federal Register PDF
FR Doc. 97-12955 Schedules of Controlled Substances: Proposed Removal of Fenfluramine From the Controlled Substances Act; Correction
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-12955]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[DEA Number 162C]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Proposed Removal of
Fenfluramine From the Controlled Substances Act; Correction
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Justice.
ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the proposed rule (DEA-
162P) which was published Tuesday, May 6, 1997 (62 FR 24620). The
proposed rule related to the removal of fenfluramine from the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Sapienza, Chief, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug
Enforcement Administration, Washington, D.C. 20537, (202) 307-7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The proposed regulation that is the subject of this correction
makes amendment to Part 1308 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations to remove the anorectic drug, fenfluramine, including its
salts, isomers and salts of isomers from control under the CSA.
Need for Correction
As published, this proposed rule allowed for a 60 day period for
comments, objections and requests for a hearing. As stipulated in 21
CFR 1308.44(g), the Administrator may designate in the notice of the
proposed rulemaking, the time during which written comments and
objections may be filed. However, as stipulated in 21 CFR 1308.45(a),
requests for a hearing on a proposed rulemaking must be filed within 30
days after the date of publication of the proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication on May 6, 1997 of the proposed rule
(DEA-162P), which was the subject of FR Doc. 97-11689, is corrected as
follows:
On page 24620, in the first column, in the DATES section, the entry
``Comments, objections, and requests for a hearing must be received on
or before July 7, 1997.'' is corrected to read ``Comments and
objections must be received on or before July 7, 1997. Requests for a
hearing must be received on or before June 5, 1997.
Dated: May 12, 1997.
James Milford,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-12955 Filed 5-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.