2109007 Informal Interpretation

1111
Sheinberg, Samuel I.
From: 	HSRHelp
Sent: 	Thursday, September 2, 2021 3:18 PM
To: 	Walsh, Kathryn E.; Berg, Karen E.; Sheinberg, Samuel I.; Six, Anne; Whitehead, Nora; Shaffer, Kristin
Subject: 	FW: Multi-step closing
To: 	>
Cc: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
From: Musick, Vesselina <vmusick@ftc.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 3:18:09 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Subject: RE: Multi-step closing
The transaction is reportable. SOP is determined looking at the parties as they stand before the transaction.
Best,
Vesselina
Vesselina Musick
Attorney | Federal Trade Commission | Premerger Notification Office
Direct +1 202.326.2307 | Email: vmusick@ftc.gov | www.ftc.gov
From: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 10:18 AM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E. <kwalsh@ftc.gov>; Berg, Karen E. <KBERG@ftc.gov>; Sheinberg, Samuel I.
<SSHEINBERG@ftc.gov>; Six, Anne <asix@ftc.gov>; Whitehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>; Musick, Vesselina
<vmusick@ftc.gov>; Shaffer, Kristin <kshaffer@ftc.gov>
Subject: FW: Multi-step closing
From:
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 10:18:11 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: Multi-step closing
Hello PNO,
Fund A controls Partnership B, a newly-formed limited partnership. Assume that Size of Transaction and Size of Person
are satisfied while Fund A controls Partnership B.
In a multi-step closing, in which each step would occur nearly simultaneously (and certainly all on the same day),
Partnership B will, in the first step, acquire more than 50% of the interests of Target, an LLC. In the second step, certain
interest holders of Target will exchange their interests in Target for LP interests of Partnership B, resulting in Fund A no
longer controlling Partnership B. Therefore, at the conclusion of all of the closing steps, Partnership B, not Fund A, will
be Target’s ultimate parent entity and Partnership B does not satisfy Size of Person.
Is this transaction reportable because, at the first step, Size of Person is satisfied due to Fund A’s control of Partnership
B? Or does the continuum, or similar principle, permit a conclusion that it is not reportable because Partnership B (no
longer controlled by Fund A) does not satisfy Size of Person?
Thanks,
1

2