Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the complaint met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements under Art. 42(2) BGG and Art. 95 ff. BGG.
Decisione estratta
The complaint did not identify any admissible ground of appeal or engage with the cantonal reasoning; the reasoning defect was obvious.
Motivazione estratta
The appellant failed to explain how the cantonal decision violated federal law and did not address the finding that no objective reasons showed a lack of trust or inadequate representation.