Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the cantonal non-entry decision had to be overturned because the complainant's constitutional complaint was sufficiently reasoned
Decisione estratta
No. The complaint did not meet the reasoning requirements and failed to show any constitutional or convention breach in the non-entry decision.
Motivazione estratta
The federal court reviewed only the formal question of access to the complaint procedure. The appellant mainly contested the lawfulness of the detention itself, not the reasoning of the non-entry decision. He did not explain, as required by Art. 90(1)(b) OG, why the cantonal court's refusal to enter into the matter was arbitrary or otherwise unconstitutional.