Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42(1) and Art. 106(2) BGG
Decisione estratta
No. The appellant merely restated her view of the facts and did not show which federal rights were violated by the cantonal non-entry and denial of legal aid.
Motivazione estratta
The Federal Supreme Court reviews constitutional complaints only when specifically raised and properly substantiated. The submission lacked any legally sufficient challenge to the appealed decision.