Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the cantonal court arbitrarily assessed the evidence regarding public understanding and confusion linked to the term 'pédicure'.
Decisione estratta
No. The appellants' criticisms were largely appellatory, unsupported by the record, or irrelevant to the constitutional review; the cantonal court could assess the evidence as it did.
Motivazione estratta
Arbitrariness requires a manifestly untenable result. The appellants did not show that specific evidence was ignored or misconstrued, and part of their argument concerned the substantive application of unfair competition law rather than proof assessment.