Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the subsidiary constitutional complaint was sufficiently reasoned to be admissible
Decisione estratta
The complaint did not meet the strict reasoning requirements for alleging violations of constitutional rights and therefore could not be examined on the merits.
Motivazione estratta
In a subsidiary constitutional complaint, the complainant must clearly and specifically show, by reference to the cantonal decision, which constitutional rights were violated and how. The filing merely repeated general objections, including an alleged denial of hearing and reference to the subsistence minimum, without engaging with the decisive reasoning of the lower court.