Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the appeal against the incidental remand decision was admissible under Art. 93 LTF.
Decisione estratta
No. The challenged decision was incidental and neither a non-reparable legal prejudice nor the conditions for immediate final disposition and avoidance of lengthy evidence were shown.
Motivazione estratta
The appellant did not claim any legal prejudice that could not be cured by a later final decision, and did not show that granting the appeal would immediately end the case and avoid a long and costly evidentiary procedure. The exception in Art. 93(1) LTF must be applied restrictively in criminal matters.