Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the federal appeal was sufficiently reasoned under Art. 42 LTF
Decisione estratta
No. The appellant failed to address the cantonal court's reasoning and therefore did not show any violation of federal law.
Motivazione estratta
Art. 42(1) and (2) LTF requires concise reasoning explaining the alleged legal violation. Because no argument was raised against the decisive inadmissibility reasoning, the appeal did not meet the admissibility requirements and had to be dismissed under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.