Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale

  • Ricerca giuridica con accesso a oltre 1 milione di fonti
  • Automazione dei documenti
  • Gestione delle pratiche
  • Ospitato nell'UE e in Svizzera

Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)

Prova gratisVedi una demo

Late and unreasoned appeal declared inadmissible

8C_888/2009Tribunale federale / IV divisione di diritto pubblico5 nov 2009Inadmissible

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Supreme Court, sitting as a single judge in the Social Law Division, held that the appeal against the Geneva Administrative Court judgment was inadmissible. The appellant stated she had learned of the judgment on 13 August 2009, but the appeal was filed only on 14 September 2009 and was sent to a post office in Dakar rather than through Swiss Post or a Swiss diplomatic or consular mission. In addition, the submission did not set out a clear request or a legally sufficient reasoning. The court therefore entered no merits review and waived court costs.

Massima Omnilex

Art. 100 al. 1, 42 al. 1-2, 48 al. 1 and 108 al. 1-2 LTF; inadmissibility of a federal appeal for lateness and deficient reasoning. An appeal to the Federal Supreme Court must be filed within thirty days and through a permissible filing channel; submission to a foreign post office does not satisfy Art. 48 al. 1 LTF. Moreover, the appeal must clearly indicate the conclusions sought and, in a concise manner, explain why the challenged decision violates the law. A submission that merely lists legal provisions without substantiating the alleged unlawfulness is manifestly insufficient and may be rejected in simplified procedure. In such a case, the court may refrain from imposing judicial costs under Art. 66 al. 1 LTF (consid. 1-2).

Testo completo

{T 0/2}
8C_888/2009

Arrêt du 5 novembre 2009
Ire Cour de droit social

Composition
M. le Juge Frésard, en qualité de juge unique.
Greffier: M. Métral.

Parties
N.________, Sénégal,
recourante,

contre

Université de Genève, Rue Général-Dufour 24, 1204 Genève,
intimée.

Objet
Election et non reconduction du rapport de service,

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal administratif de la République et canton de Genève du 28 juillet 2009.

Vu:
le recours du 14 septembre 2009 (timbre postal) contre le jugement du Tribunal administratif de la République et canton de Genève du 28 juillet 2009,
considérant:
que selon l'art. 100 al. 1 LTF, un recours au Tribunal fédéral doit être déposé dans les trente jours qui suivent la notification de l'expédition complète du jugement entrepris,
que par ailleurs, le recours doit indiquer, entre autres exigences, les conclusions, les motifs et les moyens de preuve, en exposant succinctement en quoi l'acte attaqué est contraire au droit (art. 42 al. 1 et 2 LTF),
qu'en l'occurrence, la recourante allègue avoir pris connaissance du jugement entrepris le 13 août 2009, de sorte que le recours, qui a été remis le 14 septembre 2009, à l'adresse du Tribunal fédéral, à un bureau de poste à Dakar, et non à La Poste suisse ou à une représentation diplomatique ou consulaire suisse (cf. art. 48 al. 1 LTF), est tardif,
qu'en outre, le recours ne permet pas de déterminer quelle décision exactement la recourante entend obtenir, ni ne contient de motivation répondant aux exigences de l'art. 42 LTF, la recourante se limitant à citer diverses dispositions légales - dont une partie semble sans rapport avec le litige - sans préciser en quoi le jugement entrepris contreviendrait à ces dispositions,
que partant, le recours doit être déclaré irrecevable, sans frais (art. 66 al. 1, 2ème phrase LTF), selon la procédure simplifiée de l'art. 108 al. 1 et 2 LTF,

par ces motifs, le Juge unique prononce:

1.
Le recours est irrecevable.

2.
Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3.
Le présent arrêt est communiqué aux parties et au Tribunal administratif de la République et canton de Genève.

Lucerne, le 5 novembre 2009

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit social
du Tribunal fédéral suisse
Le Juge unique: Le Greffier:

Frésard Métral

Parole chiave

inadmissibilitydeadlinepleading requirementsfiling channelsimplified procedurecourt costsemployment relationship

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory deadline

Decisione estratta

The appeal was untimely because it was filed after the thirty-day deadline and was not lodged through a permissible filing channel.

Motivazione estratta

The appellant claimed to have learned of the judgment on 13 August 2009; the appeal submitted on 14 September 2009 to a post office in Dakar, rather than Swiss Post or a Swiss diplomatic/consular representation, did not satisfy the filing requirements.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's pleading requirements

Decisione estratta

The appeal did not contain an identifiable request or sufficient reasoning showing how the challenged judgment violated the law.

Motivazione estratta

The appellant merely cited various statutory provisions, some apparently unrelated to the dispute, without explaining the alleged unlawfulness of the lower-court judgment.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the appeal should be entered into or rejected without costs in simplified procedure

Decisione estratta

The appeal was declared inadmissible in simplified procedure and no court costs were charged.

Motivazione estratta

Because the appeal was clearly late and insufficiently reasoned, summary non-entry under the simplified procedure was appropriate; the court waived costs.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.