Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF.
Decisione estratta
No. The appeal did not explain sufficiently why the cantonal judgment was unlawful or why the factual findings were manifestly incorrect.
Motivazione estratta
The filing mainly restated the procedural history, criticized a final decision, described medical and personal circumstances, and expressed wishes for benefits; this did not satisfy Art. 42 paras. 1-2 LTF.