Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale

  • Ricerca giuridica con accesso a oltre 1 milione di fonti
  • Automazione dei documenti
  • Gestione delle pratiche
  • Ospitato nell'UE e in Svizzera

Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)

Prova gratisVedi una demo

LAMO coverage denied for lack of Geneva domicile

ATA/209/1998Corte di giustizia / Camera amministrativa21 apr 1998Inadmissible

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Administrative Court held that the insured person no longer had domicile in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC. As a result, she could not qualify for coverage under LAMO. The court therefore declared her appeal inadmissible.

Massima Omnilex

Art. 23 CC; LAMO.22 al.5; domicile as a condition for LAMO coverage. Where the claimant no longer has domicile in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC, the statutory condition for coverage is not met. In such a case, the appeal seeking the benefit of LAMO is inadmissible, as the absence of domicile excludes entitlement ab initio (consid. n.a.).

Testo completo

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ASSURANCE OBLIGATOIRE; COUVERTURE; DEBITEUR; AFFECTION OCULAIRE; SEJOUR A L'HOPITAL; RESILIATION; PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE; CONDITION DE RECEVABILITE; DOMICILE; ASSU

Normes

LAMO.22 al.5

Résumé

Le TA a déclaré irrecevable le recours déposé par une assurée, au motif que celle-ci n'était plus considérée comme domiciliée à Genève au sens de l'art. 23 CC. Elle ne pouvait dès lors en aucun cas être mise au bénéfice de la LAMO.

Parole chiave

social insurancehealth insurancedomicileadmissibilitycoverageadministrative procedure

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the appeal was admissible in light of the claimant’s domicile for LAMO purposes.

Decisione estratta

The claimant was not domiciled in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC and therefore could not be covered by LAMO; the appeal was inadmissible.

Motivazione estratta

LAMO coverage was conditional on Geneva domicile. Since the claimant no longer met that domicile requirement, the substantive legal basis for coverage was absent, making the appeal incapable of success.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.