Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale
Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)
ATA/712/1996•Two-month driver’s license withdrawal confirmed
ATA/712/1996Corte di giustizia / Camera amministrativa26 nov 1996Confirmed
Estratto da Omnilex
The administrative court upheld a two-month driver’s license withdrawal imposed for speeding. It held that it had no reason to depart from the criminal court’s findings, because the criminal judge is in principle the authority that must first determine whether the offense was committed. The appeal against the duration and basis of the withdrawal was therefore rejected.
LCR art. 16 al. 2 and 17 al. 1; withdrawal of driving licence for speeding; the administrative authority is generally bound by the criminal court’s findings on the commission of the offense, absent compelling reasons to depart from them. The administrative judge need not re-examine the established facts where the criminal judge has already ruled on the offense (consid. 2). The duration of the measure is upheld where no error in the factual premise or in the application of the legal criteria is shown.
Descripteurs
CIRCULATION ROUTIERE; RETRAIT DE PERMIS; DUREE; EXCES DE VITESSE; DROIT PENAL; LCR
Normes
LCR.16 al.2; LCR.17 al.1
Résumé
- Retrait du permis de conduire de 2 mois pour excès de vitesse confirmé.
- Le TA n'a aucune raison de s'écarter des constatations faites par le juge pénal à qui il a appartient d'abord fondamentalement de se prononcer sur la réalisation de l'infraction reproché (ATF 106 Ib p.398 consid. 2).
- Retrait du permis de conduire de 2 mois pour excès de vitesse confirmé.
- Le TA n'a aucune raison de s'écarter des constatations faites par le juge pénal à qui il a appartient d'abord fondamentalement de se prononcer sur la réalisation de l'infraction reproché (ATF 106 Ib p.398 consid. 2).
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether the two-month driver’s license withdrawal for speeding had to be upheld
The two-month withdrawal was confirmed.
The court found no reason to depart from the criminal judge’s findings, since that judge is primarily responsible for determining whether the offense occurred.
Whether the administrative court could depart from the criminal court’s findings on the traffic offense
No departure was justified.
The administrative court deferred to the criminal judgment’s factual determinations regarding the offense.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.