Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale
Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)
ATA/738/1996•Social housing tenant must change flat despite cooperative membership
ATA/738/1996Corte di giustizia / Camera amministrativa10 dic 1996Dismissed
Estratto da Omnilex
The court held that a social-housing tenant did not satisfy the conditions of Art. 39A LGL by stating that he was not seeking a cheaper apartment because he expected a second child. It further held that his status as a member of the cooperative owning the building did not exempt him from the obligation to move to another apartment. The challenge was dismissed.
Art. 39A LGL; obligation to change apartment in social housing; the tenant must satisfy the statutory conditions for remaining in the dwelling. A personal wish to keep the apartment because of an anticipated second child does not by itself defeat the relocation requirement. Membership in the housing cooperative owning the building does not constitute an exception to, or obstacle against, the statutory duty to change apartments (consid. unspecified).
Descripteurs
ALLOCATION DE LOGEMENT; LOGEMENT SOCIAL; LOGEMENT; SOCIETE COOPERATIVE D'HABITATION; LOCATAIRE; CHANGEMENT DE LOGEMENT; IEA
Normes
LGL.39 A
Résumé
Le locataire qui prétend ne pas chercher un appartement moins cher car il entend avoir un deuxième enfant, ne répond pas à la condition de l'art.39 A LGL. Le fait qu'il soit sociétaire d'une société coopérative propriétaire de l'immeuble n'est pas un obstacle à l'obligation de changer d'appartement.
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether the tenant met the conditions of Art. 39A LGL to avoid changing apartment.
No. A tenant who says he is not seeking a cheaper flat because he expects a second child does not satisfy the statutory condition.
The stated family-planning reason does not justify remaining in an apartment when the statutory conditions for relocation are otherwise met.
Whether membership in the housing cooperative prevents an obligation to change apartments.
No. Cooperative membership does not bar enforcement of the relocation obligation.
Being a shareholder/member of the cooperative owning the building does not exempt the tenant from the rule requiring a change of apartment.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.