Inventory listing vs. formal monument protection

ATA/796/1998Corte di giustizia / Camera amministrativa8 dic 1998Dismissed

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The court considered a challenge to a monument-protection decision. It held that the appellant had not demonstrated that mere inventory listing was inadequate. Given the subsidiary character of classification, the court found the more stringent measure unnecessary and disproportionate, and dismissed the appeal.

Massima Omnilex

LPMNS 11 al. 2; protection of monuments; distinction between inventory listing and classification: classification constitutes a more intrusive protection measure and is justified only where inventory listing does not sufficiently safeguard the protected interest. The burden lies on the complainant to show the inadequacy of the less severe measure. Absent such proof, and where the additional protection would be unnecessary or disproportionate, classification must be refused (consid. unspecified).

Testo completo

Descripteurs

PROCEDURE DE CLASSEMENT; PROTECTION DES MONUMENTS; MONUMENT; INVENTAIRE; CE

Normes

LPMNS.11 al.2

Résumé

Différence entre une mise à l'inventaire et un classement. La recourante n'a pas démontré que la mise à l'inventaire était insuffisante. Le classement apparait en outre comme une mesure inutile et disproportionnée. .

Parole chiave

monument protectioninventory listingclassificationproportionalitysubsidiaritycultural heritage

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether formal classification of the monument was justified despite existing inventory listing.

Decisione estratta

The appellant did not show that inventory listing was insufficient; formal classification was unnecessary and disproportionate.

Motivazione estratta

The court distinguished inventory listing from classification and held that the more intrusive measure was not warranted on the record.

Inventory listing vs. formal monument protectionGenerato dall'IA