Whether the appeal satisfied the formal requirements of conclusions and reasoning
No. The appeal contained neither clear conclusions nor a sufficient statement of reasons, and the defect was not cured within the additional time granted.
Under Art. 61 let. b LPGA and Art. 79 al. 1 LPA-VD, an appeal must state the conclusions and reasons and include the challenged decision. After warning under Art. 27 al. 5 LPA-VD and a time limit to supplement the filing, the appellant remained inactive.