27 C 178/15•Rejection of motion to pursue claims against former advisory board members
27 C 178/15Tribunale di primo grado4 mag 2016Diritto civileRespinto
Estratto da Omnilex
The plaintiffs challenged the rejection of a proposed resolution concerning whether the condominium community should pursue damages claims against former advisory board members. The Bonn District Court held that rejecting the proposal was consistent with proper administration because the underlying claims had no prospect of success. It dismissed the action and ordered the plaintiffs to bear the litigation costs jointly and severally. The judgment was declared provisionally enforceable, subject to the stated security arrangement.
WEG § 21(3); proper administration and rejection of a resolution proposal to pursue claims against former advisory board members. The rejection of a proposal to assert damages claims on behalf of a condominium community does not violate the requirements of proper administration where those claims have no prospect of success. The community is not required, as a matter of proper administration, to pursue claims that are not reasonably capable of succeeding.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-05-04
Aktenzeichen: 27 C 178/15
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2016:0504.27C178.15.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: 27. Zivilabteilung
Normen: WEG § 21 Abs. 3
Die Ablehnung eines Beschlussantrages widerspricht nicht ordnungsgemäßer Verwaltung, wenn die darauf beziehende Geltendmachung von Schadensersatzansprüchen der Gemeinschaft gegen frühere Beiratsmitglieder keine Aussicht auf Erfolg hat.
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits tragen die Kläger als Gesamtschuldner.
Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar. Die Kläger dürfen die Vollstreckung der Beklagten durch Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe von 110 % des aufgrund des Urteils vollstreckbaren Betrages abwenden, wenn nicht die Beklagten zuvor Sicherheit in gleicher Höhe leisten.
Whether rejecting a resolution proposal to pursue damages claims against former condominium advisory board members violated proper administration.
The rejection did not violate proper administration because the community's damages claims had no prospect of success.
A resolution refusing to pursue claims is consistent with proper administration where those claims against former advisory board members are unlikely to succeed.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.