22 C 136/17•Access to automated processing logic for debt collection
22 C 136/17Tribunale di primo grado18 gen 2018Protezione dei datiParzialmente accolto
Estratto da Omnilex
The Düsseldorf District Court considered the plaintiff’s request for information about the automated processing of his personal data in debt-collection activity arising from I GmbH invoices dated 6 March 2010 to 8 January 2011. It ordered the defendant to disclose the logical structure of processing used to send reminders and apply for payment orders against the plaintiff. The court dismissed the remainder of the action. The judgment allocates costs 21% to the plaintiff and 79% to the defendant, but also includes a separate statement that the defendant bears the costs. It was issued without an oral hearing in simplified proceedings.
The judgment grants a limited right to information concerning the logical structure of automated processing of personal data used for specified debt-collection steps: sending reminders and applying for payment orders in relation to identified invoice claims. The disclosure ordered is confined to that processing context and those claims; the remainder of the action is dismissed. The decision text does not state the substantive statutory basis or elaborate further doctrinal criteria for the information obligation.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2018-01-18
Aktenzeichen: 22 C 136/17
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2018:0118.22C136.17.00
Dokumenttyp: Schlussurteil
Spruchkörper: Abteilung 22
hat das Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
im vereinfachten Verfahren gemäß § 495a ZPO
ohne mündliche Verhandlung am 18.01.2018
durch den Richter am Amtsgericht N
für Recht erkannt:
Die Beklagte wird verurteilt, dem Kläger Auskunft zu erteilen über den logischen Aufbau der automatisierten Verarbeitung seiner personenbezogenen Daten in Bezug auf den Versand der Mahnungen und die Beantragung von Mahnbescheiden gegen den Kläger aufgrund von Forderungen der damaligen I GmbH gemäß deren Rechnungen vom 06.03.2010 bis 08.01.2011.
Im Übrigen wird die Klage abgewiesen.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits werden dem Kläger zu 21 % und der Beklagten zu 79 % auferlegt.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits werden der beklagten Partei auferlegt.
Dieses Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar.
Ohne Tatbestand (gemäß § 313a Abs. 1 ZPO).
Whether the plaintiff was entitled to information about the logical structure of automated processing of his personal data for sending reminders and applying for payment orders.
The defendant must provide information about that logical structure in relation to the specified debt-collection steps and invoices.
The plaintiff's remaining claims for relief.
The remaining claims were denied.
Allocation of the costs of the proceedings.
The judgment allocates costs 21% to the plaintiff and 79% to the defendant; it also contains a further, conflicting statement that the defendant bears the costs.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.