Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale
Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)
BAG 4 AZR 843/09•Revision dismissed; claims held inadmissible
BAG 4 AZR 843/09Bag / 4a divisione16 nov 2011Dismissed
Estratto da Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dealt with a revision in a labour dispute arising from a parallel leading case. The court disposed of the matter in abbreviated form, without a statement of facts or reasons, and clarified the tenor of the lower judgment. The revision was rejected with the proviso that the underlying actions were dismissed as inadmissible. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in a leading parallel case, the Federal Labour Court may decide in abbreviated form. If the decisive procedural defect concerns admissibility, the dispositive part is to be formulated as a dismissal of the action as inadmissible; the revision is then rejected accordingly. The cost consequence follows the outcome of the revision proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-16
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 843/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 28. Mai 2009, Az: 14 Ca 5096/08, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 29. Oktober 2009, Az: 6 Sa 332/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 29. Oktober 2009 - 6 Sa 332/09 - wird mit der Maßgabe zurückgewiesen, dass die Klagen als unzulässig zurückgewiesen werden.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 839/09 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Bepler | Treber | Winter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| von Dassel | J. Ratayczak |
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether the revision was admissible and whether the actions had to be dismissed as inadmissible.
The revision was rejected, but the dispositive wording was clarified so that the claims are dismissed as inadmissible.
The court used the abbreviated form permitted in the context of the leading parallel proceedings and decided the matter without findings of fact and reasons.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.