Revision in labor case dismissed

BAG 4 AZR 187/13Bag / 4a divisione18 giu 2014Dismissed

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Labor Court's judgment. In light of the parallel proceeding 4 AZR 50/13, the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons. The only operative consequence stated is that the plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Massima Omnilex

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; revision in labor proceedings dismissed without written reasons where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case. Where the Federal Labor Court rejects the revision, the challenged appellate judgment remains in force; the revocation or modification of the lower-court decision is not ordered, and the losing party bears the costs of the revision.

Testo completo

BAG — 4 AZR 187/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 187/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 186/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 344/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 344/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Parole chiave

revisionlabor lawcostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasons

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the LAG judgment was successful.

Decisione estratta

The revision was unsuccessful and the LAG judgment remained in force.

Motivazione estratta

The court dismissed the revision; the document does not set out separate reasons because the parties waived factual findings and reasons.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.