Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale
Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)
BAG 4 AZR 472/16•Revision dismissed in labor law appeal
BAG 4 AZR 472/16Bag / 4a divisione22 mar 2017Dismissed
Estratto da Omnilex
The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the Baden-Württemberg Regional Labor Court judgment. The court decided the matter in line with a parallel case and, because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons, issued a shortened judgment. The only operative consequence recorded in the tenor is that the claimant must bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in a labor-law revision case, the Federal Labor Court may issue a shortened judgment without full factual and legal reasons; the revision is dismissed when the court resolves the case in accordance with a parallel proceeding. The costs of the unsuccessful revision fall on the appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 472/16
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR472.16.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 218/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 11 Sa 75/15, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 11 Sa 75/15 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Eylert | Klose | Rinck | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Ratayczak | Rupprecht |
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether the claimant's revision against the regional labor court judgment should be allowed or dismissed.
The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.
The Federal Labor Court decided the case by reference to the parallel proceeding and, consistent with the parties' waiver, did not set out findings of fact or reasons.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.