Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale
Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)
BAG 4 AZR 865/15•Revision dismissed in labor dispute
BAG 4 AZR 865/15Bag / 4a divisione5 lug 2017Dismissed
Estratto da Omnilex
The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Düsseldorf Higher Labor Court. The decision was rendered without factual findings or reasons because the parties had waived them in view of a parallel proceeding (4 AZR 866/15). The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties, in view of a parallel proceeding, waive the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment, the Federal Labor Court may dispense with these parts of the decision. A revision that is not successful is to be dismissed, with the costs of the revision borne by the unsuccessful appellant. In such a case, the judgment may be issued in shortened form without a detailed recitation of the facts or reasoning.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-07-05
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 865/15
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:050717.U.4AZR865.15.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Düsseldorf, 16. März 2015, Az: 15 Ca 9/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 30. November 2015, Az: 14 Sa 818/15, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 30. November 2015 - 14 Sa 818/15 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung im Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 866/15 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Eylert | Creutzfeldt | Klose | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redeker | Bredendiek |
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Düsseldorf Higher Labor Court judgment should succeed.
The revision was unsuccessful and the lower court judgment remained unchanged.
No factual findings or reasons were set out in the decision; the parties had waived them in light of the parallel case.
Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.
The plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.
The revision was dismissed.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.