Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale

  • Ricerca giuridica con accesso a oltre 1 milione di fonti
  • Automazione dei documenti
  • Gestione delle pratiche
  • Ospitato nell'UE e in Svizzera

Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)

Prova gratisVedi una demo

Election complaint and recusal motion dismissed as inadmissible

BVerfG 2 BvC 1/15Bverfg / 2a divisione12 giu 2017Dismissed

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a recusal motion against Judge Müller as inadmissible and also rejected a Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde. The complaint was found unsuccessful for the reasons already set out in the rapporteur’s letter of 4 April 2017; pursuant to § 26(3) sentence 3 EuWG in conjunction with § 24 sentence 2 BVerfGG, the court declined to provide any further reasoning.

Massima Omnilex

§ 19 BVerfGG; § 24 S. 2 BVerfGG; § 26 Abs. 3 S. 3 EuWG; summary dismissal of recusal motion and election complaint: a recusal motion may be rejected as inadmissible without substantive examination where the requirements are not met. An election complaint may likewise be dismissed without further reasons if, according to the statutory reference mechanism, the court relies on the grounds already communicated by the rapporteur and abstains from a detailed statement of reasons under § 24 S. 2 BVerfGG in conjunction with § 26 Abs. 3 S. 3 EuWG.

Testo completo

BVerfG — 2 BvC 1/15, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-06-12

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvC 1/15

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:cs20170612.2bvc000115

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 19 BVerfGG, § 24 S 2 BVerfGG, § 48 BVerfGG, § 26 Abs 3 S 3 EuWG

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde sowie eines Ablehnungsgesuchs ohne weitere Begründung

Tenor

Der Ablehnungsantrag gegen Richter Müller wird als unzulässig verworfen.

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde wird verworfen.

Gründe

1 Der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde bleibt aus den im Schreiben des Berichterstatters vom 4. April 2017 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG in Verbindung mit § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.

Parole chiave

election complaintrecusalinadmissibilitysummary dismissalreasoning omitted

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the motion to recuse Judge Müller was admissible

Decisione estratta

The recusal motion was inadmissible.

Motivazione estratta

The court rejected the motion summarily and gave no further reasoning.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the election complaint had merit

Decisione estratta

The election complaint was rejected.

Motivazione estratta

The complaint was unsuccessful for the reasons stated in the rapporteur’s letter of 4 April 2017; under § 26(3) sentence 3 EuWG in conjunction with § 24 sentence 2 BVerfGG, no further reasons were given.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.