Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale
Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)
BVerwG 5 B 21/16, 5 B 21/16 (5 C 1/17)•Leave to appeal on youth welfare in- or outside Germany
BVerwG 5 B 21/16, 5 B 21/16 (5 C 1/17)Bverwg / 5a divisione5 gen 2017Granted
Estratto da Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s complaint and allowed revision. It held that the case has fundamental importance because revision may clarify whether, for purposes of youth welfare, the relevant criterion for distinguishing domestic benefits under § 6(1) SGB VIII from foreign benefits under § 6(3) SGB VIII is a specific point in time or a broader period.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal for fundamental importance: fundamental significance exists where the appellate proceedings can clarify an unresolved legal question of general importance. In determining whether a youth welfare benefit is domestic within the meaning of § 6 Abs. 1 SGB VIII or foreign within the meaning of § 6 Abs. 3 SGB VIII, the decisive temporal reference point or relevant period was uncertain and warranted revision for clarification (consid. 1-2).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-01-05
Aktenzeichen: 5 B 21/16, 5 B 21/16 (5 C 1/17)
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:050117B5B21.16.0
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 6 Abs 1 SGB 8, § 6 Abs 3 SGB 8
Vorinstanz: vorgehend OVG Lüneburg, 20. Januar 2016, Az: 4 LB 14/13, Urteilvorgehend VG Hannover, 22. Juli 2011, Az: 3 A 3879/08, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 5. Senat
Revisionszulassung; Leistung der Jugendhilfe im Inland oder Ausland
1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, auf welchen Zeitpunkt oder Zeitraum es für die Bestimmung, ob eine Leistung der Jugendhilfe im Inland (§ 6 Abs. 1 SGB VIII) oder im Ausland (§ 6 Abs. 3 SGB VIII) vorliegt, maßgeblich ankommt.
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental significance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.
Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.
The appeal could clarify at what point in time or over what period the classification of a youth welfare benefit as domestic under § 6(1) SGB VIII or foreign under § 6(3) SGB VIII depends.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.