Retroactive salary reduction after belated co-determination

BVerwG 2 B 118/09, 2 B 118/09 (2 C 23/10)Bverwg / 2a divisione5 mag 2010Granted

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court held that the complaint against non-admission of revision was admissible and well-founded because the case raises a question of fundamental importance: whether a co-determination procedure completed only later for working-time regulations can justify retroactive further reduction of a part-time civil servant’s salary. The excerpt does not contain the full dispositive wording beyond the finding that the complaint is well-founded.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance of a complaint against non-admission of revision. A question is of fundamental importance when it concerns an unresolved, legally relevant issue capable of clarification in revision and material to the contested judgment. This may be the case where it is disputed whether the subsequent completion of a mandatory co-determination procedure in relation to working-time regulations can retroactively justify a further reduction in the remuneration of part-time civil servants (consid. 1).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 2 B 118/09, 2 B 118/09 (2 C 23/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-05-05

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 118/09, 2 B 118/09 (2 C 23/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 6 Abs 1 BBesG, BPersVG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 10. September 2009, Az: 4 S 2816/07, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Arbeitszeitregelung; Nachholung des Mitbestimmungsverfahrens; rückwirkende Kürzung der Besoldung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Wie sie zu Recht geltend macht, kommt der Frage grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu, ob die Nachholung eines Mitbestimmungsverfahrens bei mitbestimmungspflichtigen Arbeitszeitregelungen rückwirkend eine weitergehende Kürzung der Besoldung teilzeitbeschäftigter Beamter rechtfertigt.

Parole chiave

working timeco-determinationcivil servantssalary reductionfundamental importancerevision complaint

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the complaint raises a question of fundamental importance regarding retroactive salary reduction after belated co-determination of working-time regulations.

Decisione estratta

The complaint is well-founded because the case presents a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Motivazione estratta

The court held that it is a legally significant open question whether completing the co-determination procedure for co-determination-sensitive working-time rules can retroactively justify a further reduction in the remuneration of part-time civil servants.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.