Questione giuridica chiave
Whether revision should be admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance regarding the lawful setting of fixed reimbursement ceilings for medicinal expenses under the BBhV.
Decisione estratta
Revision is admitted so that the requirements for a legally effective determination of fixed amounts as an upper limit for reimbursable drug expenses can be clarified.
Motivazione estratta
The court found that the case is capable of clarifying a question of fundamental significance within the meaning of § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.