Lo spazio di lavoro basato sull'IA per i professionisti del settore legale
Prova gratis per 14 giorni (10 domande/giorno durante la prova)
BVerwG 2 B 48/13, 2 B 48/13 (2 C 39/13)•Revision admitted in civil servants’ pay discrimination case
BVerwG 2 B 48/13, 2 B 48/13 (2 C 39/13)Bverwg / 2a divisione24 set 2013Granted
Estratto da Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court held that the case raised reviewable questions on whether former §§ 27 and 28 BBesG violated the EU prohibition of age discrimination, whether claims to higher remuneration had to be asserted within the current budget year, and whether Article 3(4) of Directive 2000/78/EC also covered national pay rules. It therefore admitted the revision.
Revision admission may be warranted where the case raises unresolved questions of law of general significance; in particular, the compatibility of former civil-service remuneration rules with the prohibition of age discrimination under Directive 2000/78/EC, the temporal requirements for asserting higher remuneration claims, and the scope of Article 3(4) of the Directive present issues suitable for clarification in revision proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-09-24
Aktenzeichen: 2 B 48/13, 2 B 48/13 (2 C 39/13)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz, 20. Februar 2013, Az: 10 A 11167/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat
1 Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet zur Klärung beizutragen, ob die Vorschriften der §§ 27 und 28 BBesG a.F. gegen das Verbot der Altersdiskriminierung aus Art. 1 i.V.m. Art. 2 Abs. 1 und 2 der RL 2000/78/EG verstoßen, ob der Anspruch auf eine über das Gesetz (§§ 27 und 28 BBesG a.F.) hinausgehende Besoldung innerhalb des laufenden Haushaltsjahres geltend zu machen ist und ob sich die Bereichsausnahme des Art. 3 Abs. 4 der RL 2000/78/EG auch auf besoldungsrechtliche Regelungen der Mitgliedstaaten erstreckt.
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted to clarify possible incompatibility of former §§ 27 and 28 BBesG with EU age-discrimination law and related issues.
The case is suitable for clarification in revision proceedings.
The court considered the questions raised regarding age discrimination, retroactive assertion of salary claims, and the scope of the directive’s sectoral exception to be suitable for review by the court of revision.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.