Service Employees International Union Local 790 (PERB A356M)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DECISION OF THE
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD
RICARDO PAEZ,
Charging Party,
v.
SEIU LOCAL 790,
Respondent.
Case No. SF-CO-90-M
Administrative Appeal
PERB Order No. 	Ad-356-M
A u g u s t 	3 0 , 	2006
Appearance: Ricardo Paez, on his own behalf.
Before Shek, McKeag and Neuwald, Members.
DECISION
NEUWALD, Member: This case comes before the Public Employment Relations
Board (PERB or Board) on appeal by
1Ricardo Paez (Paez) from the Appeals Assistant's
administrative determination that his request for reconsideration of SEIU Local 790 (Paez)
(2005) PERB Decision No. 1774-M (SEIU (Paez)) was untimely.
The Board has reviewed the entire record in this matter, including, the administrative
appeal filed by Paez. The Board issued SEIU (Paez) on August 10, 2005. PERB
Regulation 324101 requires a request for reconsideration to be filed with the Board itself within
20 days of service of the final decision. Paez filed his request on April 3, 2006, nearly six
months later. As such, his request was untimely. Paez fails to state good cause as to why his
motion should be considered. Therefore, Paez motion must be denied as untimely filed.
1PERB regulations are codified at California Code of Regulations, title 8,
section 310001, et seq.

ORDER
The request by Ricardo Paez that the Board reconsider PERB Decision No. 1774-M is
hereby DENIED as untimely filed.
Members Shek and McKeag joined in this Decision.
22