Testo completo
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-11636
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. A095-467-499
MEI YUN ZHUO,
Petitioner,
versus
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
________________________
Petition for Review of a Decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
________________________
(December 31, 2012)
Before MARCUS, KRAVITCH and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The BIA denied Mei Yun Zhuo’s untimely motion to reopen removal
proceedings, after the BIA concluded that she failed to demonstrate changed
Case: 12-11636 Date Filed: 12/31/2012 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
country conditions -- particularly in Zhuo’s area of China or for parents of
children born in the United States -- within China.
Zhuo seeks review of the BIA’s denial of her motion to reopen her removal
proceedings: BIA’s judgment was made in 2008. The motion to reopen was made
in 2011. Zhuo did not demonstrate that changed country conditions within China
excepted her untimely motion to reopen from the Immigration and Nationality
Act’s (“INA”) time limitation on motions to reopen. Nothing shows that the BIA
failed to deal with the evidence, and the BIA did not abuse its discretion by
denying her motion to reopen. So, we deny her petition for review.
PETITION DENIED.
2
Case: 12-11636 Date Filed: 12/31/2012 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
